Measuring intersectoral collaboration in a health care setting: A knowledge synthesis

Introduction: The importance of integration across the continuum of care is not limited to the health care sector. Coordinating client care between sectors and including supportive services such as education and social services is considered an essential part of building a fully integrated health sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of integrated care 2016-12, Vol.16 (6), p.11
Hauptverfasser: Oelke, Nelly D, Stiphout, Michelle Lynn, Suter, Esther, Hepp, Shelanne, Rostami, Mahnoush, Birney, Arden, Janke, Robert, Van Vliet-Brown, Cheryl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: The importance of integration across the continuum of care is not limited to the health care sector. Coordinating client care between sectors and including supportive services such as education and social services is considered an essential part of building a fully integrated health system. Building on previous integration research, this study is a part of a comprehensive systematic review focused on identifying indicator and measures of the key principles of integration. We identified 16 indicator domains through a modified Delphi process using an expert panel of policy-makers, decision-makers, providers, and researchers. Intersectoral collaboration was identified as one of two indicator domains for the first principle of successful health systems integration, Comprehensive Services across the Continuum of Care.Methods: Search terms were generated for intersectoral collaboration to identify tools in the peer-reviewed and targeted gray literature. Tools were identified through a rigorous review process including abstract review, relevancy ratings, identifying additional articles in reference lists, quality ratings, and extraction. To avoid duplication of tools, only “tool development” articles were included in data extraction. If an article was found which used but did not develop an appropriate tool, the original article reporting the development and testing of the tool was identified and data was extracted from this source only. Notable exceptions included articles where the original tool was modified to measure intersectoral collaboration.Results: A review of 650 abstracts identified 14 tools which measure intersectoral collaboration. Most of the tools were questionnaires or checklists and were created or tested in a health care setting or with health related outcomes. The tools collected information from organizations in different sectors in a number of differed ways. Distributing a questionnaire or checklist to multiple organizations to measure the perceived level of mutual collaboration was the most common way. Network analysis was also used and one tool measured intersectoral collaboration as a quadrant using a balanced scorecard approach.The variables identified to measure intersectoral collaboration include identifying “high and low structure” between partnering organizations; a low level of connectivity represented “cooperation and coordination” and a high level of connectivity represented “collaboration and consolidation”. Other va
ISSN:1568-4156
1568-4156
DOI:10.5334/ijic.2954