Roughness Test of Aluminum A5052 before and after Forming by SPIF Process
Single point incremental forming process, which is also known as SPIF, that forms from one direction. SPIF process was used for milling an aluminum metallic sheet. In this paper, an aluminum (A5052) sheet was formed in a conical shape by the SPIF process. The A5052 sheet was deformed by the computer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Key engineering materials 2023-05, Vol.946, p.23-28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Single point incremental forming process, which is also known as SPIF, that forms from one direction. SPIF process was used for milling an aluminum metallic sheet. In this paper, an aluminum (A5052) sheet was formed in a conical shape by the SPIF process. The A5052 sheet was deformed by the computer numerical control (CNC) technology in the T60 series milling machine. The conical shape was deformed by the spiral toolpath in the T60 series milling machine. At the surface of the A5052, lubricant grease was continuously applied manually for reducing the friction generated due to milling. Also, for decreasing the tool rotational force friction on the A5052 sheet there was the use of lubricant. Moreover, 0.1mm step-down is used for the tool path because it takes more time for forming a metallic sheet, however, it deformed the sheet smoothly. The 0.5mm step-down g-code was extracted from fusion 360. Then the metallic sheet A5052 surface was compared before and after deformation. For testing a metallic sheet A5052 the formability parameter was analyzed in the experiment part. The experiment was performed to find the optimal smooth surface from the CNC milling machine. The initial roughness value and the microscopic image were presented in the investigational part. Likewise, the comparison of points for the highest and lowest rough point was further discussed and compared throughout the experiment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1013-9826 1662-9795 1662-9795 |
DOI: | 10.4028/p-n5x2df |