Comparative Study on Energy Yield of Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) and Passivated Emitter and Rear Contact (PERC) Solar Cells and Analysis of Optimal Installation Method for Vertical Photovoltaics
Photovoltaic (PV) installations have traditionally relied on a conventional south-facing orientation, which maximizes energy production at noon but has lower energy generation in the morning and afternoon. Vertical photovoltaic (VPV) systems have emerged as promising alternatives to address this inc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Process integration and optimization for sustainability 2024-09, Vol.8 (4), p.993-1001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Photovoltaic (PV) installations have traditionally relied on a conventional south-facing orientation, which maximizes energy production at noon but has lower energy generation in the morning and afternoon. Vertical photovoltaic (VPV) systems have emerged as promising alternatives to address this inconsistency. Vertical photovoltaic systems can enhance energy generation by facing east in the morning and west in the afternoon. We compared the performance of n-tunnel oxide passivated contact (n-TOPCon) and p-passivated emitter and rear contact (p-PERC) cells in vertical photovoltaic systems to determine whether the optimal installation direction of bifacial vertical photovoltaics is east or west. Our findings indicated that n-TOPCon cells exhibited higher energy yields than p-PERC cells, with a difference of approximately 8%, attributed to the superior bifaciality and lower temperature coefficient of power of n-TOPCon. Additionally, the energy yield was higher for n-TOPCon modules when the front faced east, whereas the PERC modules performed better with a west-facing front. This contributes to the knowledge of the factors for energy production in vertical photovoltaic systems and the optimization of installation configurations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2509-4238 2509-4246 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s41660-024-00408-4 |