Incentives for recruiting trainee participants in medical education research

Introduction: In the growing field of medical education research, participant recruitment can be challenging. Incentives, either tangible or intangible, may be offered to encourage participation. This study aimed to understand these incentives and explore the relationship between study quality and i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical teacher 2018-02, Vol.40 (2), p.181-187
Hauptverfasser: Stovel, R. G., Ginsburg, S., Stroud, L., Cavalcanti, R. B., Devine, L. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: In the growing field of medical education research, participant recruitment can be challenging. Incentives, either tangible or intangible, may be offered to encourage participation. This study aimed to understand these incentives and explore the relationship between study quality and incentives in medical education research. Methods: We reviewed research studies examining medical trainees published in five major journals in 2008. Tangible and intangible incentives used in recruitment were extracted by two researchers. For each quantitative article, medical education research quality instrument (MERSQI) score was calculated and citation counts for all articles were compiled. Results: Of 215 included articles, 8% explicitly reported incentives. Tangible incentives (value range $15-$60 USD) were offered in 7.9% of studies. Intangible incentives were identified in 30% of studies but only one specifically discussed their use. Tangible incentives correlated with a higher MERSQI score (p 
ISSN:0142-159X
1466-187X
DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1395402