DEMURRAGE, DETENTION, AND OPPORTUNITY COSTS: A PROPOSED CONTRACTING SOLUTION
Disputes are swirling amongst carriers, marine terminals, shippers, and policy-makers about demurrage and detention charges, with the shippers claiming that the carriers and marine terminals are using demurrage and detention more as a revenue generator than as a fee for holding onto assets (i.e., co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of transportation law, logistics, and policy logistics, and policy, 2018-01, Vol.85 (2), p.168-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Disputes are swirling amongst carriers, marine terminals, shippers, and policy-makers about demurrage and detention charges, with the shippers claiming that the carriers and marine terminals are using demurrage and detention more as a revenue generator than as a fee for holding onto assets (i.e., containers). The Federal Maritime Commission has signaled that it prefers a market solution rather than a governmental dictate. One of its six suggestions is an optional billing model wherein terminal operators bill shippers directly for demurrage and ocean carriers bill shippers for detention; or similar models to resolve disputes, provide clarity, and transparency. We propose a contracting model grounded in Agency Theory as part of a potential marketbased resolution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-5906 |