Unlocking oil reserves: Optimizing polymer injection for enhanced recovery

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two polymer mobility design methods, namely Endpoint and James Sheng methods, for optimizing the viscosity target in polymer injection enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Coreflood tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the mobility design method on i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Swadesi, Boni, Asmorowati, Dewi, Widyaningsih, Indah, Sanmurjana, Mahruri, Husenido, Sinosa, Kardin, Adelia Paramita
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two polymer mobility design methods, namely Endpoint and James Sheng methods, for optimizing the viscosity target in polymer injection enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Coreflood tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the mobility design method on injected polymer viscosity and oil recovery. The results showed that the choice of mobility design method significantly affected the injected polymer viscosity and ultimate oil recovery. A higher polymer viscosity was found to increase sweep efficiency, resulting in better oil recovery, but also led to injectivity issues. Thus, careful consideration is required when selecting a polymer mobility design method to achieve optimum oil recovery while minimizing injectivity issues. These findings have significant implications for optimizing the polymer injection process for EOR applications.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0218415