Numerical lists of foundational knowledge in early Chinese and early Buddhist traditions

In this paper, I compare the material in the Pāli canon of Theravada Buddhism, a textual tradition famous for the abundance of numerical lists, with certain chapters of the 逸周書 and chapter “Hong fan” 洪範 of the 尚書, where numerical lists are equally important. I propose a classification of the insuffi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asiatische Studien 2021-03, Vol.74 (3), p.453-484
1. Verfasser: Grebnev, Yegor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, I compare the material in the Pāli canon of Theravada Buddhism, a textual tradition famous for the abundance of numerical lists, with certain chapters of the 逸周書 and chapter “Hong fan” 洪範 of the 尚書, where numerical lists are equally important. I propose a classification of the insufficiently studied numerical lists in the and point out the divergences in them, suggesting that they were produced by competing communities that developed slightly discordant systems of knowledge. I compare the evolution of complex frameworks of numerical lists in the Buddhist traditions and in early China, arguing that both created comprehensive systems of knowledge-practice out of simpler lists. The peculiar form of numerical lists as vehicles of systematised knowledge-practice attested in both cultures may have originated in hierarchical communities with indisputable knowledge authority. Such communities are known to have existed in early Buddhism, and they have convincing parallels in China’s contemporary political practice, where numerical lists are used to unify the patterns of thinking and behaviour in hierarchical groups.
ISSN:0004-4717
2235-5871
DOI:10.1515/asia-2020-0012