In situ X-ray Diffraction Studies of Cation and Anion Inter­calation into Graphitic Carbons for Electrochemical Energy Storage Applications

Graphite is a redox‐amphoteric intercalation host and thus capable to incorporate various types of cations and anions between its planar graphene sheets to form so‐called donor‐type or acceptor‐type graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) by electrochemical intercalation at specific potentials. Whil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie (1950) 2014-08, Vol.640 (10), p.1996-2006
Hauptverfasser: Placke, Tobias, Schmuelling, Guido, Kloepsch, Richard, Meister, Paul, Fromm, Olga, Hilbig, Peter, Meyer, Hinrich-Wilhelm, Winter, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Graphite is a redox‐amphoteric intercalation host and thus capable to incorporate various types of cations and anions between its planar graphene sheets to form so‐called donor‐type or acceptor‐type graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) by electrochemical intercalation at specific potentials. While the LiCx/Cx donor‐type redox couple is the major active compound for state‐of‐the‐art negative electrodes in lithium‐ion batteries, acceptor‐type GICs were proposed for positive electrodes in the “dual‐ion” and “dual‐graphite” cell, another type of electrochemical energy storage system. In this contribution, we analyze the electrochemical intercalation of different anions, such as bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide or hexafluorophosphate, into graphitic carbons by means of in situ X‐ray diffraction (XRD). In general, the characterization of battery electrode materials by in situ XRD is an important technique to study structural and compositional changes upon insertion and de‐insertion processes during charge/discharge cycling. We discuss anion (X–) and cation (M+) intercalation/de‐intercalation into graphites on a comparative basis with respect to the Mx+Cn– and Cn+Xn– stoichiometry, discharge capacity, the intercalant gallery height/gallery expansion and the M–M or X–X in‐plane distances.
ISSN:0044-2313
1521-3749
DOI:10.1002/zaac.201400181