Value of digital breast tomosynthesis in characterization of breast lesions in dense breast

Background Patients with dense breasts have a higher risk factor for developing breast cancer. Digital mammography (DM) exhibits a reduced sensitivity in dense breast tissue as a result of overlapping fibro-glandular tissue. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) solves this problem, so allows better ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2024-12, Vol.55 (1), p.131-11, Article 131
Hauptverfasser: Romeih, Marwa, Raafat, Tarek Ahmed, Ahmed, Gehad, Shalaby, Shymaa Abd El-Mawla, Ahmed, Wafaa Ali Heidar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Patients with dense breasts have a higher risk factor for developing breast cancer. Digital mammography (DM) exhibits a reduced sensitivity in dense breast tissue as a result of overlapping fibro-glandular tissue. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) solves this problem, so allows better characterization of masses, asymmetries, and parenchymal distortion. It is useful in screening studies for early detection of breast lesions by accurate detection and description of their margins, shape, and extent as well as surrounding structures. Objective We aimed to evaluate the added value of DBT in characterizing of different breast lesions in dense breasts compared to DM. Methods A Prospective Cohort study involved ninety female cases having dense breast parenchyma (ACR C & ACR D) having breast complaint lesions detected by DM or ultrasound or recalled from screening units, during the period from June 2021 to Jan 2023. All patient underwent DM and DBT with correlation with the pathological finding or follow up. Results As regards the characterization of breast mass DBT had higher sensitivity, higher specificity (98%, 87% respectively). However, DM showed less sensitivity, less specificity (58%, 80%,) with ( p  
ISSN:2090-4762
0378-603X
2090-4762
DOI:10.1186/s43055-024-01298-9