People Are Not Points in Space: Network Models of Beliefs and Discussions

Metaphors of positions, spectrums, perspectives, viewpoints, and polarization reflect the same model, which treats beliefs-and the people who hold them-as points in space. This model is deeply rooted in quantitative research methods and influential traditions of Continental philosophy, and it is evi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical review (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-04, Vol.36 (1-2), p.119-145
1. Verfasser: Levine, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Metaphors of positions, spectrums, perspectives, viewpoints, and polarization reflect the same model, which treats beliefs-and the people who hold them-as points in space. This model is deeply rooted in quantitative research methods and influential traditions of Continental philosophy, and it is evident in some qualitative research. It can suggest that deliberation is difficult and rare because many people are located far apart ideologically, and their respective positions can be explained as dependent variables of factors like personality, partisanship, and demographics. An alternative model treats a given person's beliefs as connected by reasons to form networks. People disclose the connections among their respective beliefs when they discuss issues. This model offers insights about specific cases, such as discussions conducted on two US college campuses, which are represented here as belief-networks. The model also supports a more optimistic view of the public's capacity to deliberate.
ISSN:0891-3811
1933-8007
DOI:10.1080/08913811.2024.2344994