A segmentation method based on boundary fracture correction for froth scale measurement

During the mineral flotation process, the size characteristics of the surface froth significantly influence the production indicators of the flotation process. However, the information within froth images is intricate, with occurrences of froth stacking and bubble adhesion, resulting in indistinct b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2024-05, Vol.54 (9-10), p.6959-6980
Hauptverfasser: Gan, Yongqi, Liu, Wenzhuo, Gan, Jianwang, Zhang, Guoying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During the mineral flotation process, the size characteristics of the surface froth significantly influence the production indicators of the flotation process. However, the information within froth images is intricate, with occurrences of froth stacking and bubble adhesion, resulting in indistinct boundary information. Existing methods struggle to accurately and comprehensively segment bubble boundaries. This paper aims to devise a segmentation method that precisely delineates bubble boundaries, enabling the measurement of bubble size characteristics and an assessment of both average bubble size and bubble count status. A cascaded decoding branch incorporating omni-dimensional convolutional point rendering is designed, leveraging the rendering concept to reanalyze and categorize misclassified pixels. This recalibration process enhances segmentation accuracy by addressing these inaccuracies. Experiments were performed using an on-site froth industrial dataset, demonstrating the substantial advantage of the proposed method in segmenting and measuring flotation froth scenes. Specifically, the segmentation accuracy reached 92.86%. Additionally, the measurement errors for the average bubble size and bubble count were only 10.3% and 8.6%, respectively.
ISSN:0924-669X
1573-7497
DOI:10.1007/s10489-024-05552-5