Mitigating Distributional Shift in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation From Unlabeled Data

Knowing when a trained segmentation model is encountering data that is different to its training data is important. Understanding and mitigating the effects of this play an important part in their application from a performance and assurance perspective-this being a safety concern in applications su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on robotics 2024, Vol.40, p.3146-3165
Hauptverfasser: Williams, David S. W., Martini, Daniele De, Gadd, Matthew, Newman, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Knowing when a trained segmentation model is encountering data that is different to its training data is important. Understanding and mitigating the effects of this play an important part in their application from a performance and assurance perspective-this being a safety concern in applications such as autonomous vehicles. This article presents a segmentation network that can detect errors caused by challenging test domains without any additional annotation in a single forward pass. As annotation costs limit the diversity of labeled datasets, we use easy-to-obtain, uncurated and unlabeled data to learn to perform uncertainty estimation by selectively enforcing consistency over data augmentation. To this end, a novel segmentation benchmark based on the sense-assess-eXplain (SAX) is used, which includes labeled test data spanning three autonomous-driving domains, ranging in appearance from dense urban to off-road. The proposed method, named \mathrm{\gamma }\text{-}\text{SSL}, consistently outperforms uncertainty estimation and out-of-distribution techniques on this difficult benchmark-by up to 10.7% in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and 19.2% in area under the precision-recall curve in the most challenging of the three scenarios.
ISSN:1552-3098
1941-0468
DOI:10.1109/TRO.2024.3401020