Static response of wind turbine blades: Comparison of low- and high-fidelity numerical models

As wind turbine blades become longer and more flexible, the structural models employed in current aeroelastic simulation tools, usually based on beam formulations, are challenged. Effects previously considered negligible in the response of these beam-like structures might now become significant to o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2024-06, Vol.2767 (5), p.052037
Hauptverfasser: Antunes, A M, Verelst, D R, Riva, R, Kim, T, Haselbach, P U, Zahle, F, Berring, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As wind turbine blades become longer and more flexible, the structural models employed in current aeroelastic simulation tools, usually based on beam formulations, are challenged. Effects previously considered negligible in the response of these beam-like structures might now become significant to obtain accurate predictions of their behaviour. To assess this, a test matrix covering key geometric and material characteristics of wind turbine blades is defined and three test cases are analysed as an initial stage of this study. For each case, the static deflection of the beam model from the aeroelastic tool HAWC2 is compared against higher-fidelity shell/solid finite element models. Three structures are studied: an isotropic box beam, a composite box beam and a 12.6 m wind turbine blade from DTU. A good match is observed for the box beam test cases, which study the effects of out-of-plane and distortion warping and bend-twist coupling. Important aspects of high-fidelity models (such as end effects) are highlighted. The study of the DTU 12.6 m blade shows a significant difference (15%) in the torsion natural frequencies of the beam model, though a good agreement in twist angle under torsional loading. More pronounced differences in twist angle are observed when a load distribution based on the steady state response is applied, likely resulting from challenges in modelling complex structural features and three-dimensional effects.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/2767/5/052037