Research on current control strategy of overvoltage flexible suppression device based on cascaded linear-nonlinear active disturbance rejection controller
In order to improve the immunity and speed tracking performance of active inverters in resonant overvoltage flexible suppression under load variation, parameter perturbation, and other uncertainties, a current control strategy of a resonant overvoltage flexible grounding device based on a cascading...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIP advances 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.055136-055136-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In order to improve the immunity and speed tracking performance of active inverters in resonant overvoltage flexible suppression under load variation, parameter perturbation, and other uncertainties, a current control strategy of a resonant overvoltage flexible grounding device based on a cascading linear-nonlinear active disturbance rejection controller is proposed in this paper. First, the mathematical model of the flexible device considering load disturbance and parameter mismatch is established. Second, a cascade of linear and nonlinear extended state observers is designed to estimate and compensate the uncertain disturbance of the system in real time. The former linear extended state observer ensures the stability of the system under large disturbance, and the latter nonlinear extended state observer further improves the estimation accuracy of the disturbance by using the nonlinear mechanism. Finally, the flexible grounding system based on PI control and cascaded linear-nonlinear active disturbance rejection control (CL-NLADRC) is simulated and compared. Compared with PI control, NLADRC, and CLADRC, the current drop of the proposed CL-NLADRC during loading is 0.03 kA, which is 81.1%, 85.7%, and 73% of the three, respectively, and the regulation time is 13 ms, which is 82%, 75%, and 18.7% shorter than the three, respectively. The speed increase during load shedding is 93.5%, 80.5%, and 74.3% of the three, and the adjustment time is shortened by 80%, 73%, and 28%, respectively. The superiority of the proposed method is verified. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2158-3226 2158-3226 |
DOI: | 10.1063/5.0194753 |