Plasma CD24 level as a promising prognostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma constitutes the most common primary hepatic cancer and remains a major medical burden in both developing and developed world. It ranks fifth in terms of global cases and second in terms of deaths for males.CD24 is known as a heavily glycosylated cell surface molec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Egyptian Liver Journal 2024-05, Vol.14 (1), p.36-11, Article 36
Hauptverfasser: Rasmy, Hany Samir, Awad, Emad Ahmad, Mohamed, Eslam Safwat, Boshra, Amal Samy, Ibrahim, Shereen Abdel Monem, Isaac, Amira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Hepatocellular carcinoma constitutes the most common primary hepatic cancer and remains a major medical burden in both developing and developed world. It ranks fifth in terms of global cases and second in terms of deaths for males.CD24 is known as a heavily glycosylated cell surface molecule that is highly expressed in a wide variety of human malignancies. It plays an important role in self-renewal, proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential role of serum CD24 in the diagnosis and prediction of response to interventional therapy among hepatocellular carcinomas. Methods This study included 40 adult Egyptian patients who had liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC group). Another group of 20 patients with liver cirrhosis only served as controls (Cirrhosis group). All patients underwent standard laboratory tests and abdominal ultrasound. For HCC patients, a triphasic CT scan, alpha-fetoprotein was done. CD24 levels were measured in all patients, and in HCC patients at baseline and one month after intervention. Results Baseline CD24 was significantly higher among HCC group in comparison to cirrhosis group (19.463 ± 8.573 vs. 0.725 ± 0.125 mg/L) with an overall p value 
ISSN:2090-6226
2090-6218
2090-6226
DOI:10.1186/s43066-024-00343-6