Study on protolytic equilibria and the effects of pH, cyclodextrins and polysorbate 80 on solubility of raloxifene hydrochloride

The acid–base equilibria of raloxifene and the mutual influence of pH and solubility enhancers on the solubility of raloxifene hydrochloride were studied. The apparent ionization constants (p K a *) of raloxifene were determined potentiometrically in methanol–water mixtures (45%-55% w/w), and the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical papers 2024-05, Vol.78 (7), p.4401-4410
Hauptverfasser: Popović-Nikolić, Marija R., Čakar, Mira, Todorović, Nina, Nikolić, Katarina, Popović, Gordana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The acid–base equilibria of raloxifene and the mutual influence of pH and solubility enhancers on the solubility of raloxifene hydrochloride were studied. The apparent ionization constants (p K a *) of raloxifene were determined potentiometrically in methanol–water mixtures (45%-55% w/w), and the p K a values (p K a1  = 7.21 ± 0.02, p K a2  = 7.86 ± 0.02, p K a3  = 9.97 ± 0.04) defining ionization in aqueous media were obtained by extrapolating the p K a * values to 0% of methanol. The obtained p K a values were assigned to the corresponding ionization centers. Based on the ionization constants obtained in this study, the distribution of the equilibrium forms of raloxifene was calculated. The solubility of raloxifene hydrochloride in 0.01 M HCl, acetate buffer pH 4.5 and phosphate buffer pH 6.8 was studied with and without the presence of β -CD, HP- β -CD and polysorbate 80. The most effective solubility enhancer of raloxifene hydrochloride in 0.01 M HCl was polysorbate 80 at a concentration of 0.5%, while the influence of this enhancer in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 was negligible. The highest solubility of raloxifene hydrochloride in acetate and phosphate buffer was achieved in the presence of 10 –3  M HP– β- CD which was 1.3-fold higher in both 0.01 M HCl and acetate buffer and 2.3-fold higher in phosphate buffer than in the presence of 10 –3  M β -CD. Graphical abstract
ISSN:0366-6352
1336-9075
2585-7290
DOI:10.1007/s11696-024-03399-1