Plant biomass of grasses in actively restored grasslands shows stronger association with eco‐physiological properties than in degraded native grasslands

Grassland degradation levels determine plant eco‐physiological properties, and thus influences ecosystem function. However, how land degradation affects the relationship between plant biomass and eco‐physiological properties of native and artificially restored grasslands is insufficiently understood. Here, we evaluated aboveground biomass (AGB), plant photosynthetic capacity, as well as soil texture, in a series of native grasslands (non‐degraded, slightly degraded, moderately degraded, heavily degraded, and extremely degraded) and artificially restored grasslands with different growth times (5, 9, 11, 14 and 17 years) within the alpine grassland ecosystem of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau during the plant growing season. Results showed that, in native grasslands, land degradation significantly decreased the nitrogen (N) concentration and AGB of grasses but did not impact the phosphorus (P) concentration. In actively restored grasslands, the AGB, photosynthetic rate (Pn), N and P of grasses decreased significantly after 9 years or longer of replanting time. Furthermore, the AGB of grasses in actively restored grasslands showed stronger association with eco‐physiological properties than in native grasslands. In native grasslands, degradation affected AGB directly, but also indirectly through Pn. In actively restored grasslands, degradation affected AGB directly, but also indirectly through Pn, N and P. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms by which grass species respond to degradation differ between native and actively restored grasslands. Also, compared to native grasslands, the eco‐physiological properties of grasses are more sensitive to changing environmental conditions in actively restored grasslands. More importantly, the differing response mechanisms are likely to alter the plant community dynamics and future ecosystem stability.