Multi-Representation Joint Dynamic Domain Adaptation Network for Cross-Database Facial Expression Recognition

In order to obtain more fine-grained information from multiple sub-feature spaces for domain adaptation, this paper proposes a novel multi-representation joint dynamic domain adaptation network (MJDDAN) and applies it to achieve cross-database facial expression recognition. The MJDDAN uses a hybrid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronics (Basel) 2024-04, Vol.13 (8), p.1470
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Jingjie, Yue, Yuebo, Yu, Kai, Zhou, Xiaoyang, Liu, Ying, Wei, Jinsheng, Yang, Yuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In order to obtain more fine-grained information from multiple sub-feature spaces for domain adaptation, this paper proposes a novel multi-representation joint dynamic domain adaptation network (MJDDAN) and applies it to achieve cross-database facial expression recognition. The MJDDAN uses a hybrid structure to extract multi-representation features and maps the original facial expression features into multiple sub-feature spaces, aligning the expression features of the source domain and target domain in multiple sub-feature spaces from different angles to extract features more comprehensively. Moreover, the MJDDAN proposes the Joint Dynamic Maximum Mean Difference (JD-MMD) model to reduce the difference in feature distribution between different subdomains by simultaneously minimizing the maximum mean difference and local maximum mean difference in each substructure. Three databases, including eNTERFACE, FABO, and RAVDESS, are used to design a large number of cross-database transfer learning facial expression recognition experiments. The accuracy of emotion recognition experiments with eNTERFACE, FABO, and RAVDESS as target domains reach 53.64%, 43.66%, and 35.87%, respectively. Compared to the best comparison method chosen in this article, the accuracy rates were improved by 1.79%, 0.85%, and 1.02%, respectively.
ISSN:2079-9292
2079-9292
DOI:10.3390/electronics13081470