Effect of fluorine-containing explosion suppressants on methane explosions
To investigate the suppression effect of fluorine-containing explosion suppressants (FESs) on methane (CH 4 ) explosions and the corresponding suppression mechanism, a 20-L spherical explosion testing device was used to analyze and compare the effects of perfluorohexanone (C 6 F 12 O) and heptafluor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 2024-04, Vol.149 (8), p.3711-3722 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To investigate the suppression effect of fluorine-containing explosion suppressants (FESs) on methane (CH
4
) explosions and the corresponding suppression mechanism, a 20-L spherical explosion testing device was used to analyze and compare the effects of perfluorohexanone (C
6
F
12
O) and heptafluoropropane (C
3
F
7
H) on CH
4
explosion parameters. The explosion limit and pressure were obtained before and after adding these FESs. CH
4
explosion triangles under the action of the FESs were drawn, and the explosion hazard degree (
F
) was determined. The results reveal that the addition of C
6
F
12
O and C
3
F
7
H reduces the upper explosion limit (UEL) and lower explosion limit (LEL) of CH
4
, with increased concentrations of C
6
F
12
O and C
3
F
7
H causing faster decreases in the UEL than in the LEL. The explosion limit range of CH
4
with C
6
F
12
O is smaller than that with C
3
F
7
H. When the concentration of CH
4
is low, increases in the C
6
F
12
O and C
3
F
7
H concentrations first cause an increase and then a decrease in the explosion pressure, and the rise rate of explosion pressure increases. After adding the aforementioned FESs,
F
first increases and then decreases. When the concentration of CH
4
is high, the two FESs only inhibit the explosion pressure. Compared with C
3
F
7
H, C
6
F
12
O has a stronger inhibitory effect; C
6
F
12
O has a smaller CH
4
explosion triangle area, higher critical oxygen concentration (18.27% vs. 17.70%), and lower
F
value. Both FESs have promotion and inhibition effects on CH
4
explosion because of the comprehensive physical and chemical effects on CH
4
explosions; however, the performance of C
6
F
12
O is superior to C
3
F
7
H. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1388-6150 1588-2926 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10973-024-12967-2 |