Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use?
In the past 20 years, many US communities have sought to improve cycling infrastructure to increase the safety and efficiency of their transportation systems. Cycling has the potential to improve environmental health in urban areas as well as contribute to a healthy lifestyle for its users. It also...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | ITE journal 2024-03, Vol.94 (3), p.31-36 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 36 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 31 |
| container_title | ITE journal |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Smaglik, Edward J |
| description | In the past 20 years, many US communities have sought to improve cycling infrastructure to increase the safety and efficiency of their transportation systems. Cycling has the potential to improve environmental health in urban areas as well as contribute to a healthy lifestyle for its users. It also serves as a method to possibly reduce congestion on motorized facilities by giving people another viable option. However, considerations for the mobility and safety of vulnerable roadway users are critical issues. Here, Smaglik et al outline considerations specifically for separated bike lanes and offer treatment strategies for numerous one- and two-way scenarios. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3039733840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3039733840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-35648522458b795fdbd9c7e80370d97fabc26320d17a340138542d004f3c4be73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs1KAzEYAHNQsFbfIeB54Uu-ZJP1ItpqLVQUtHgs-VubsmzqJntYn96CnuY2M2dkBqzmlWZKX5DLnA8AIECKGVm-DTENscSf2H_Rh-gm18Vc6LtpQ5mo6T19STZ2sUy39HMf3Z6uxuhN7wJdJrqm2xzursh5a7ocrv85J9unx4_Fc7V5Xa0X95vqyBiWCmUttORcSG1VI1tvfeNU0IAKfKNaYx2vkYNnyqAAhloK7k-nLTphg8I5ufnzHof0PYZcdoc0Dv0puUPARiFqAfgLlRdDyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039733840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smaglik, Edward J</creator><creatorcontrib>Smaglik, Edward J</creatorcontrib><description>In the past 20 years, many US communities have sought to improve cycling infrastructure to increase the safety and efficiency of their transportation systems. Cycling has the potential to improve environmental health in urban areas as well as contribute to a healthy lifestyle for its users. It also serves as a method to possibly reduce congestion on motorized facilities by giving people another viable option. However, considerations for the mobility and safety of vulnerable roadway users are critical issues. Here, Smaglik et al outline considerations specifically for separated bike lanes and offer treatment strategies for numerous one- and two-way scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-8178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Institute of Transportation Engineers</publisher><subject>Bicycles ; Bicycling ; Cities ; Design ; Environmental health ; Fatalities ; Infrastructure ; Mobility ; Polls & surveys ; Safety ; Traffic accidents & safety ; Traffic control ; Transportation systems ; Trends ; Urban areas ; Urban transportation</subject><ispartof>ITE journal, 2024-03, Vol.94 (3), p.31-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Transportation Engineers Mar 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smaglik, Edward J</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use?</title><title>ITE journal</title><description>In the past 20 years, many US communities have sought to improve cycling infrastructure to increase the safety and efficiency of their transportation systems. Cycling has the potential to improve environmental health in urban areas as well as contribute to a healthy lifestyle for its users. It also serves as a method to possibly reduce congestion on motorized facilities by giving people another viable option. However, considerations for the mobility and safety of vulnerable roadway users are critical issues. Here, Smaglik et al outline considerations specifically for separated bike lanes and offer treatment strategies for numerous one- and two-way scenarios.</description><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Traffic accidents & safety</subject><subject>Traffic control</subject><subject>Transportation systems</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban transportation</subject><issn>0162-8178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotjs1KAzEYAHNQsFbfIeB54Uu-ZJP1ItpqLVQUtHgs-VubsmzqJntYn96CnuY2M2dkBqzmlWZKX5DLnA8AIECKGVm-DTENscSf2H_Rh-gm18Vc6LtpQ5mo6T19STZ2sUy39HMf3Z6uxuhN7wJdJrqm2xzursh5a7ocrv85J9unx4_Fc7V5Xa0X95vqyBiWCmUttORcSG1VI1tvfeNU0IAKfKNaYx2vkYNnyqAAhloK7k-nLTphg8I5ufnzHof0PYZcdoc0Dv0puUPARiFqAfgLlRdDyA</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Smaglik, Edward J</creator><general>Institute of Transportation Engineers</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use?</title><author>Smaglik, Edward J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-35648522458b795fdbd9c7e80370d97fabc26320d17a340138542d004f3c4be73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Traffic accidents & safety</topic><topic>Traffic control</topic><topic>Transportation systems</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smaglik, Edward J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>ITE journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smaglik, Edward J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use?</atitle><jtitle>ITE journal</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>31-36</pages><issn>0162-8178</issn><abstract>In the past 20 years, many US communities have sought to improve cycling infrastructure to increase the safety and efficiency of their transportation systems. Cycling has the potential to improve environmental health in urban areas as well as contribute to a healthy lifestyle for its users. It also serves as a method to possibly reduce congestion on motorized facilities by giving people another viable option. However, considerations for the mobility and safety of vulnerable roadway users are critical issues. Here, Smaglik et al outline considerations specifically for separated bike lanes and offer treatment strategies for numerous one- and two-way scenarios.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Institute of Transportation Engineers</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0162-8178 |
| ispartof | ITE journal, 2024-03, Vol.94 (3), p.31-36 |
| issn | 0162-8178 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3039733840 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Bicycles Bicycling Cities Design Environmental health Fatalities Infrastructure Mobility Polls & surveys Safety Traffic accidents & safety Traffic control Transportation systems Trends Urban areas Urban transportation |
| title | Prioritizing Bicyclist Safety and Mobility: Which Guidance Do I Use? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A05%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20Bicyclist%20Safety%20and%20Mobility:%20Which%20Guidance%20Do%20I%20Use?&rft.jtitle=ITE%20journal&rft.au=Smaglik,%20Edward%20J&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=31-36&rft.issn=0162-8178&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3039733840%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039733840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |