Reproductive biology and sperm storage characters in two bobtail squid species (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae)

Bobtail squids (Family Sepiolidae) have a variety of sperm storage patterns, but their reproductive biology has not been studied in many species, especially those in Japanese waters. Two species, Austrorossia bipapillata (Subfamily Rossiinae) and Sepiolina nipponensis (Subfamily Heteroteuthinae) inh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2024-03, Vol.104, Article e20
Hauptverfasser: Sato, Noriyosi, Tanabe, Ryohei, Uezu, Takeru, Matsuoka, Toshiki, Nakajima, Asuka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bobtail squids (Family Sepiolidae) have a variety of sperm storage patterns, but their reproductive biology has not been studied in many species, especially those in Japanese waters. Two species, Austrorossia bipapillata (Subfamily Rossiinae) and Sepiolina nipponensis (Subfamily Heteroteuthinae) inhabit Suruga Bay in Japan. These were sampled approximately bimonthly by trawling at around 500 m between the end of September, 2020 and May, 2022. They were measured for body size (dorsal mantle length) and weighed for gonadosomatic index (GSI) calculation, and their sperm storage mechanism was investigated. The reproductive season occurs from May to October in A. bipapillata and from December to February in S. nipponensis. In both species, spermatangia were deposited inside the mantle cavity as implanted spermatangia. In A. bipapillata, 5.7 ± 6.5 spermatangia were deeply implanted in the opening of the oviduct, and in S. nipponensis 62.7 ± 61.5 spermatangia were attached to the left gill and surface of the connective-tissue capsule enclosing the digestive gland. The GSI was lower and there were fewer spermatophores stored in the spermatophoric sac of A. bipapillata males compared to S. nipponensis, leading us to suggest that it is exposed to weaker sperm competition than S. nipponensis, irrespective of similar sperm storage mechanism in the two species.
ISSN:0025-3154
1469-7769
DOI:10.1017/S0025315424000109