Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps
Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1097 |
container_title | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gage, Edward Cooper, David J. Lichvar, Robert |
description | Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919732508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919732508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm6Q5lrXVQtWDLXoL2d1Et2w3NdkK---NXdGbDMPM4XmG4QXgkuBrgrG8iYQRLhEmKjVlGeqPwIiojCFBM3EMRphKiTgl9BScxbjBmAhKyQi85n67M6GOvoXewfXzNJ_B1XuwFs1N2fkAX2zXmLaCt7apW2u62rcRdh4-HlbT_AKL9tO2yejhg9nFc3DiTBPtxc8cg_V8tsrv0fLpbpFPl6hkRHXIcIeFSlVm2LpiIik1krlMKiZt5USpiqrCxNmSmkw4zG1RGEsKwTHnVgg2BlfD3V3wH3sbO73x-5D-ipoqoiSjHE8SRQeqDD7GYJ3ehXprQq8J1t8J6iFBnRLUhwR1nyQ2SDHB7ZsNf6f_sb4AFFV0ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919732508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Clean Water Act-US ; Coastal Sciences ; Correspondence ; Data collection ; Digitization ; Ecology ; Environmental law ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; General Wetland Science ; Government agencies ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Image analysis ; Image processing ; Laboratories ; Landscape Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Mapping ; Polygons ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105</ispartof><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2019</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919732508?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21387,27923,27924,33743,41487,42556,43804,51318,64384,64388,72240</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><addtitle>Wetlands</addtitle><description>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clean Water Act-US</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>General Wetland Science</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Polygons</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm6Q5lrXVQtWDLXoL2d1Et2w3NdkK---NXdGbDMPM4XmG4QXgkuBrgrG8iYQRLhEmKjVlGeqPwIiojCFBM3EMRphKiTgl9BScxbjBmAhKyQi85n67M6GOvoXewfXzNJ_B1XuwFs1N2fkAX2zXmLaCt7apW2u62rcRdh4-HlbT_AKL9tO2yejhg9nFc3DiTBPtxc8cg_V8tsrv0fLpbpFPl6hkRHXIcIeFSlVm2LpiIik1krlMKiZt5USpiqrCxNmSmkw4zG1RGEsKwTHnVgg2BlfD3V3wH3sbO73x-5D-ipoqoiSjHE8SRQeqDD7GYJ3ehXprQq8J1t8J6iFBnRLUhwR1nyQ2SDHB7ZsNf6f_sb4AFFV0ag</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Gage, Edward</creator><creator>Cooper, David J.</creator><creator>Lichvar, Robert</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><author>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clean Water Act-US</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>General Wetland Science</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Polygons</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gage, Edward</au><au>Cooper, David J.</au><au>Lichvar, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1105</epage><pages>1097-1105</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-5212 |
ispartof | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105 |
issn | 0277-5212 1943-6246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919732508 |
source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Accuracy Biomedical and Life Sciences Clean Water Act-US Coastal Sciences Correspondence Data collection Digitization Ecology Environmental law Environmental Management Environmental protection Freshwater & Marine Ecology General Wetland Science Government agencies Hydrogeology Hydrology Image analysis Image processing Laboratories Landscape Ecology Life Sciences Mapping Polygons Vegetation Wetlands |
title | Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20USACE%20Three-Factor%20Wetland%20Delineations%20to%20National%20Wetland%20Inventory%20Maps&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Gage,%20Edward&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1105&rft.pages=1097-1105&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919732508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919732508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |