Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps

Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105
Hauptverfasser: Gage, Edward, Cooper, David J., Lichvar, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1105
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1097
container_title Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)
container_volume 40
creator Gage, Edward
Cooper, David J.
Lichvar, Robert
description Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919732508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919732508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm6Q5lrXVQtWDLXoL2d1Et2w3NdkK---NXdGbDMPM4XmG4QXgkuBrgrG8iYQRLhEmKjVlGeqPwIiojCFBM3EMRphKiTgl9BScxbjBmAhKyQi85n67M6GOvoXewfXzNJ_B1XuwFs1N2fkAX2zXmLaCt7apW2u62rcRdh4-HlbT_AKL9tO2yejhg9nFc3DiTBPtxc8cg_V8tsrv0fLpbpFPl6hkRHXIcIeFSlVm2LpiIik1krlMKiZt5USpiqrCxNmSmkw4zG1RGEsKwTHnVgg2BlfD3V3wH3sbO73x-5D-ipoqoiSjHE8SRQeqDD7GYJ3ehXprQq8J1t8J6iFBnRLUhwR1nyQ2SDHB7ZsNf6f_sb4AFFV0ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919732508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Clean Water Act-US ; Coastal Sciences ; Correspondence ; Data collection ; Digitization ; Ecology ; Environmental law ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; General Wetland Science ; Government agencies ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Image analysis ; Image processing ; Laboratories ; Landscape Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Mapping ; Polygons ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105</ispartof><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2019</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919732508?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21387,27923,27924,33743,41487,42556,43804,51318,64384,64388,72240</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><addtitle>Wetlands</addtitle><description>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clean Water Act-US</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>General Wetland Science</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Polygons</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm6Q5lrXVQtWDLXoL2d1Et2w3NdkK---NXdGbDMPM4XmG4QXgkuBrgrG8iYQRLhEmKjVlGeqPwIiojCFBM3EMRphKiTgl9BScxbjBmAhKyQi85n67M6GOvoXewfXzNJ_B1XuwFs1N2fkAX2zXmLaCt7apW2u62rcRdh4-HlbT_AKL9tO2yejhg9nFc3DiTBPtxc8cg_V8tsrv0fLpbpFPl6hkRHXIcIeFSlVm2LpiIik1krlMKiZt5USpiqrCxNmSmkw4zG1RGEsKwTHnVgg2BlfD3V3wH3sbO73x-5D-ipoqoiSjHE8SRQeqDD7GYJ3ehXprQq8J1t8J6iFBnRLUhwR1nyQ2SDHB7ZsNf6f_sb4AFFV0ag</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Gage, Edward</creator><creator>Cooper, David J.</creator><creator>Lichvar, Robert</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</title><author>Gage, Edward ; Cooper, David J. ; Lichvar, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a5f069696c40efb8722a73f47937edf6c9bdd01fec2a46f05ebbae1b65055e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clean Water Act-US</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>General Wetland Science</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Polygons</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gage, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gage, Edward</au><au>Cooper, David J.</au><au>Lichvar, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1105</epage><pages>1097-1105</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-5921</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-5212
ispartof Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105
issn 0277-5212
1943-6246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2919732508
source ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Accuracy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Clean Water Act-US
Coastal Sciences
Correspondence
Data collection
Digitization
Ecology
Environmental law
Environmental Management
Environmental protection
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
General Wetland Science
Government agencies
Hydrogeology
Hydrology
Image analysis
Image processing
Laboratories
Landscape Ecology
Life Sciences
Mapping
Polygons
Vegetation
Wetlands
title Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20USACE%20Three-Factor%20Wetland%20Delineations%20to%20National%20Wetland%20Inventory%20Maps&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Gage,%20Edward&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1105&rft.pages=1097-1105&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919732508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919732508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true