Comparison of USACE Three-Factor Wetland Delineations to National Wetland Inventory Maps

Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2020-10, Vol.40 (5), p.1097-1105
Hauptverfasser: Gage, Edward, Cooper, David J., Lichvar, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Wetlands are mapped across the USA for compliance with §404 of the Clean Water Act using field-collected data and protocols in the 1987 Federal Wetlands Delineation Manual (3-factor method). The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps wetlands and deepwater habitats for management and policy-making using aerial image analysis with limited field verification. There have been few comparisons of maps other than for limited geographic areas or wetland types. We compared 3-factor wetland delineations to NWI maps for 1751 assessment areas (AA) in different regions. We did not assess the accuracy of either product, but instead compared mapped area and polygon count for existing data at sites, then aggregated results to broader scales and compared with ancillary data to identify factors correlated with map differences. In a subset of NWI polygons eliminating non-wetland Cowardin types, 74% of NWI polygons were mapped in common with 3-factor polygons. NWI identified greater area in 33% of AA and greater total area across all sites. Approximately 27% of AA had 3-factor but no NWI polygons, while 6.7% of AA had features mapped only by NWI. Multiple factors likely contributed to differences including polygon size and temporal mismatches between maps, suggesting caution be used when comparing products.
ISSN:0277-5212
1943-6246
DOI:10.1007/s13157-019-01234-y