Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis

Manure management is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pig farming, which in turn accounts for 18% of the total global GHG emissions from the livestock industry. In this review, GHG emissions (N20 and CH4 emissions in particular) from individual pig manure (PGM) management pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers of environmental science & engineering 2017-06, Vol.11 (3), p.3-18, Article 11
Hauptverfasser: Dennehy, Conor, Lawlor, Peadar G., Jiang, Yan, Gardiner, Gillian E., Xie, Sihuang, Nghiem, Long D, Zhan, Xinmin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 3
container_start_page 3
container_title Frontiers of environmental science & engineering
container_volume 11
creator Dennehy, Conor
Lawlor, Peadar G.
Jiang, Yan
Gardiner, Gillian E.
Xie, Sihuang
Nghiem, Long D
Zhan, Xinmin
description Manure management is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pig farming, which in turn accounts for 18% of the total global GHG emissions from the livestock industry. In this review, GHG emissions (N20 and CH4 emissions in particular) from individual pig manure (PGM) management practices (European practises in particular) are systematically analyzed and discussed. These manure management practices include manure storage, land application, solid/liquid separation, anaerobic digestion, composting and aerobic wastewater treatment. The potential reduction in net GHG emissions by changing and optimising these techniques is assessed. This review also identifies key research gaps in the literature including the effect of straw covering of liquid PGM storages, the effect of solid/liquid separation, and the effect of dry anaerobic digestion on net GHG emissions from PGM management. In addition to identifying these research gaps, several recommendations including the need to standardize units used to report GHG emissions, to account ~br indirect N20 emissions, and to include a broader research scope by conducting detailed life cycle assessment are also discussed. Overall, anaerobic digestion and compositing to liquid and solid fractions are best PGM management practices with respect to their high GHG mitigation potential.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11783-017-0942-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918745564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>672526152</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>2918745564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-c7983e77cc2f98bbf5b71ec583141f25ef64fef2462deff394971fbcdb50b5f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYsoKKMP4C7oupqkSZMuRfwDwY2Cu9CmN22G6Y-5ncW8is_iO_kKplR0N3dzL-Gck8OXJOeMXjFK1TUypnSWUqZSWgie5gfJCaeFTDln74d_N2XHyRnimsbRWjCdnSTmIQD07bBFIE2JBDqP6IceiQtDR2rvHAToJzL6hnRlvw0wr7KBbn6dwLa9_9gCfn99kpLY4Cdvyw2Jks0OPZ4mR67cIJz97lXydn_3evuYPr88PN3ePKdWZHJKrSp0BkpZy12hq8rJSjGwUmdMMMcluFw4cFzkvAbnskIUirnK1pWklXR5tkoul9wxDHOdyayHbYgl0PCCaSWkzEVUsUVlw4AYwJkx-K4MO8OomVGaBaWJKM2M0szJfPFg1PYNhP_kfSa9mFrftBFgPQZANJFpP3kI-60Xvx3boW8-4pd_JXPFJc-Z5NkP-2-W8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918745564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Dennehy, Conor ; Lawlor, Peadar G. ; Jiang, Yan ; Gardiner, Gillian E. ; Xie, Sihuang ; Nghiem, Long D ; Zhan, Xinmin</creator><creatorcontrib>Dennehy, Conor ; Lawlor, Peadar G. ; Jiang, Yan ; Gardiner, Gillian E. ; Xie, Sihuang ; Nghiem, Long D ; Zhan, Xinmin</creatorcontrib><description>Manure management is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pig farming, which in turn accounts for 18% of the total global GHG emissions from the livestock industry. In this review, GHG emissions (N20 and CH4 emissions in particular) from individual pig manure (PGM) management practices (European practises in particular) are systematically analyzed and discussed. These manure management practices include manure storage, land application, solid/liquid separation, anaerobic digestion, composting and aerobic wastewater treatment. The potential reduction in net GHG emissions by changing and optimising these techniques is assessed. This review also identifies key research gaps in the literature including the effect of straw covering of liquid PGM storages, the effect of solid/liquid separation, and the effect of dry anaerobic digestion on net GHG emissions from PGM management. In addition to identifying these research gaps, several recommendations including the need to standardize units used to report GHG emissions, to account ~br indirect N20 emissions, and to include a broader research scope by conducting detailed life cycle assessment are also discussed. Overall, anaerobic digestion and compositing to liquid and solid fractions are best PGM management practices with respect to their high GHG mitigation potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2095-2201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2095-221X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11783-017-0942-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>Aerobic treatment ; Anaerobic digestion ; Animal wastes ; CH 4 ; Composting ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Emissions ; Environment ; Farm buildings ; Fractions ; Greenhouse gases ; Land application ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; Livestock ; Livestock industry ; Livestock Waste Management and Resource Recovery ; Manures ; N 2O ; Nitrous oxide ; Pig manure ; Review Article ; Separation ; Storage ; Swine ; Wastewater treatment ; 临界分析 ; 厌氧消化 ; 温室气体减排 ; 温室气体排放量 ; 猪粪 ; 生命周期评价 ; 管理技术 ; 粪肥管理</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering, 2017-06, Vol.11 (3), p.3-18, Article 11</ispartof><rights>Copyright reserved, 2017, Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-c7983e77cc2f98bbf5b71ec583141f25ef64fef2462deff394971fbcdb50b5f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-c7983e77cc2f98bbf5b71ec583141f25ef64fef2462deff394971fbcdb50b5f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71245X/71245X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11783-017-0942-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918745564?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dennehy, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawlor, Peadar G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gillian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Sihuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nghiem, Long D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xinmin</creatorcontrib><title>Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis</title><title>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</title><addtitle>Front. Environ. Sci. Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China</addtitle><description>Manure management is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pig farming, which in turn accounts for 18% of the total global GHG emissions from the livestock industry. In this review, GHG emissions (N20 and CH4 emissions in particular) from individual pig manure (PGM) management practices (European practises in particular) are systematically analyzed and discussed. These manure management practices include manure storage, land application, solid/liquid separation, anaerobic digestion, composting and aerobic wastewater treatment. The potential reduction in net GHG emissions by changing and optimising these techniques is assessed. This review also identifies key research gaps in the literature including the effect of straw covering of liquid PGM storages, the effect of solid/liquid separation, and the effect of dry anaerobic digestion on net GHG emissions from PGM management. In addition to identifying these research gaps, several recommendations including the need to standardize units used to report GHG emissions, to account ~br indirect N20 emissions, and to include a broader research scope by conducting detailed life cycle assessment are also discussed. Overall, anaerobic digestion and compositing to liquid and solid fractions are best PGM management practices with respect to their high GHG mitigation potential.</description><subject>Aerobic treatment</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>CH 4</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Land application</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Livestock Waste Management and Resource Recovery</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>N 2O</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>临界分析</subject><subject>厌氧消化</subject><subject>温室气体减排</subject><subject>温室气体排放量</subject><subject>猪粪</subject><subject>生命周期评价</subject><subject>管理技术</subject><subject>粪肥管理</subject><issn>2095-2201</issn><issn>2095-221X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYsoKKMP4C7oupqkSZMuRfwDwY2Cu9CmN22G6Y-5ncW8is_iO_kKplR0N3dzL-Gck8OXJOeMXjFK1TUypnSWUqZSWgie5gfJCaeFTDln74d_N2XHyRnimsbRWjCdnSTmIQD07bBFIE2JBDqP6IceiQtDR2rvHAToJzL6hnRlvw0wr7KBbn6dwLa9_9gCfn99kpLY4Cdvyw2Jks0OPZ4mR67cIJz97lXydn_3evuYPr88PN3ePKdWZHJKrSp0BkpZy12hq8rJSjGwUmdMMMcluFw4cFzkvAbnskIUirnK1pWklXR5tkoul9wxDHOdyayHbYgl0PCCaSWkzEVUsUVlw4AYwJkx-K4MO8OomVGaBaWJKM2M0szJfPFg1PYNhP_kfSa9mFrftBFgPQZANJFpP3kI-60Xvx3boW8-4pd_JXPFJc-Z5NkP-2-W8w</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Dennehy, Conor</creator><creator>Lawlor, Peadar G.</creator><creator>Jiang, Yan</creator><creator>Gardiner, Gillian E.</creator><creator>Xie, Sihuang</creator><creator>Nghiem, Long D</creator><creator>Zhan, Xinmin</creator><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W92</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis</title><author>Dennehy, Conor ; Lawlor, Peadar G. ; Jiang, Yan ; Gardiner, Gillian E. ; Xie, Sihuang ; Nghiem, Long D ; Zhan, Xinmin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-c7983e77cc2f98bbf5b71ec583141f25ef64fef2462deff394971fbcdb50b5f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerobic treatment</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>CH 4</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Land application</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Livestock Waste Management and Resource Recovery</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>N 2O</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>临界分析</topic><topic>厌氧消化</topic><topic>温室气体减排</topic><topic>温室气体排放量</topic><topic>猪粪</topic><topic>生命周期评价</topic><topic>管理技术</topic><topic>粪肥管理</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dennehy, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawlor, Peadar G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gillian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Sihuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nghiem, Long D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xinmin</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-工程技术</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dennehy, Conor</au><au>Lawlor, Peadar G.</au><au>Jiang, Yan</au><au>Gardiner, Gillian E.</au><au>Xie, Sihuang</au><au>Nghiem, Long D</au><au>Zhan, Xinmin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</jtitle><stitle>Front. Environ. Sci. Eng</stitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>3-18</pages><artnum>11</artnum><issn>2095-2201</issn><eissn>2095-221X</eissn><abstract>Manure management is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pig farming, which in turn accounts for 18% of the total global GHG emissions from the livestock industry. In this review, GHG emissions (N20 and CH4 emissions in particular) from individual pig manure (PGM) management practices (European practises in particular) are systematically analyzed and discussed. These manure management practices include manure storage, land application, solid/liquid separation, anaerobic digestion, composting and aerobic wastewater treatment. The potential reduction in net GHG emissions by changing and optimising these techniques is assessed. This review also identifies key research gaps in the literature including the effect of straw covering of liquid PGM storages, the effect of solid/liquid separation, and the effect of dry anaerobic digestion on net GHG emissions from PGM management. In addition to identifying these research gaps, several recommendations including the need to standardize units used to report GHG emissions, to account ~br indirect N20 emissions, and to include a broader research scope by conducting detailed life cycle assessment are also discussed. Overall, anaerobic digestion and compositing to liquid and solid fractions are best PGM management practices with respect to their high GHG mitigation potential.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11783-017-0942-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2095-2201
ispartof Frontiers of environmental science & engineering, 2017-06, Vol.11 (3), p.3-18, Article 11
issn 2095-2201
2095-221X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918745564
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Aerobic treatment
Anaerobic digestion
Animal wastes
CH 4
Composting
Earth and Environmental Science
Emissions
Environment
Farm buildings
Fractions
Greenhouse gases
Land application
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycles
Livestock
Livestock industry
Livestock Waste Management and Resource Recovery
Manures
N 2O
Nitrous oxide
Pig manure
Review Article
Separation
Storage
Swine
Wastewater treatment
临界分析
厌氧消化
温室气体减排
温室气体排放量
猪粪
生命周期评价
管理技术
粪肥管理
title Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A58%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20different%20pig%20manure%20management%20techniques%EF%BC%9A%20a%20critical%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20environmental%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Dennehy,%20Conor&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=3-18&rft.artnum=11&rft.issn=2095-2201&rft.eissn=2095-221X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11783-017-0942-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918745564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918745564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=672526152&rfr_iscdi=true