Reoperation in mitral valve repair for regurgitant mitral valve disease

Reviewing reoperative mitral valve repair, we evaluated a predictor for future reoperation by comparing degenerative and rheumatic mitral regurgitation. From June 1988 to September 2002, 159 patients with mitral valve regurgitation underwent a variety of surgical reconstruction. Our 9 subjects--2 me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2003-06, Vol.51 (6), p.237-241
Hauptverfasser: Nakajima, Masato, Tsuchiya, Kouji, Sasaki, Hideki, Hibino, Narutoshi, Naito, Yuji, Inoue, Hidenori, Mizutani, Eiki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reviewing reoperative mitral valve repair, we evaluated a predictor for future reoperation by comparing degenerative and rheumatic mitral regurgitation. From June 1988 to September 2002, 159 patients with mitral valve regurgitation underwent a variety of surgical reconstruction. Our 9 subjects--2 men and 7 women with a mean age of 55.3 years--including 1 undergoing initial repair at an other hospital, underwent reoperation for mitral valve lesions. Four patients had rheumatic (Group R) and 5 degenerative (Group D) mitral valve disease. We studied reoperative outcomes and initial procedures were retrospectively. The mean interval from initial repair was 111 months. Mitral valve lesions at reoperation in Group D were annular dilation in 3, leaflet prolapse in 1, and suture disruption in 1, while that in Group R involved severe thickening of both leafle. Rerepair was possible in 3 patients of Group D, but all others, (including Group R patients) required valve replacement. All survived reoperation. Rerepair in rheumatic mitral regurgitation, rerepair was difficult. In degenerative mitral valve regurgitation, however, rerepair was possible because procedure-related origin was a major cause of reoperation. Reoperation can be prevented by proper technical improvement at initial repair.
ISSN:1344-4964
1863-6705
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-003-0020-9