Evidence-based infection control in thoracic surgery

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to pose a major threat to the lung and cardiovascular surgery patients. We propose evidence-based infection control (EBIC) against MRSA. We conducted a basic study comparing genotyping to cluster analysis using minimal inhibition concentra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2002-07, Vol.50 (7), p.273-279
Hauptverfasser: Yoshida, Junichi, Kirikae, Teruo, Yamanaka, Naoki, Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Onzuka, Tatsuji, Hisahara, Manabu, Ueno, Yasutaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to pose a major threat to the lung and cardiovascular surgery patients. We propose evidence-based infection control (EBIC) against MRSA. We conducted a basic study comparing genotyping to cluster analysis using minimal inhibition concentration on 17 drugs for 21 MRSA strains. With or without EBIC using cluster analysis and global evidence, we compared the incidence of postoperative MRSA infection. Notably, we eliminated tweezers stands and emesis basins. Cluster analysis showed a typing sensitivity of 72%. The use of EBIC decreased MRSA cross-infection in the recovery room. A lung surgery series showed an MRSA incidence of 1/190 before and 0/200 after EBIC was introduced. For a cardiovascular surgery series, the MRSA incidence was 2/169 before and 0/84 after EBIC was introduced. Across wards, MRSA among Staphylococcus aureus in patient fell from 68% in 1999 to 57% in 2000. EBIC consisting of global guidelines and cluster analysis was useful in controlling MRSA in lung and cardiovascular surgery patients.
ISSN:1344-4964
1863-6705
1863-2092
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/bf03032294