Sentiment analysis of banking risk profile determination: The case study of bank XYZ

Determination of the risk profile at Bank XYZ is carried out periodically. It can be weekly, monthly, and quarterly. This risk profile itself is an information that explains the risk conditions in banking activities, from which information becomes the basis for determining risk control. One of the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yuniarti, Rina, Ruldeviyani, Yova
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Determination of the risk profile at Bank XYZ is carried out periodically. It can be weekly, monthly, and quarterly. This risk profile itself is an information that explains the risk conditions in banking activities, from which information becomes the basis for determining risk control. One of the parameters of the risk profile is negative sentiment from customers and the wider community. The large number of negative sentiments, the higher the risk that the bank has, in this case it is related to reputation risk. In addition, monitoring negative sentiment on social media is very necessary because it affects the implementation of tasks in IT work units and service work units, especially those related to complaint handling activities originating from social media. Based on the above conditions, this study discusses how to analyze the sentiments of customers on social media which are busy with pros and cons opinions so that they can be monitored, and problems resolved immediately. This sentiment data analysis uses the Lexicon-Based method. Sentiment analysis results are used to determine the score of one of the parameters in the reputation risk profile. This is adjusted to the provisions of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in determining the soundness of the Bank. From the analysis results, the distribution of sentiment results is 11.95% positive sentiment, 45.97% negative sentiment, and 42.08% neutral sentiment. From these results, a comparison is made with the risk profile matrix and the frequency of negative sentiments is included in the High category.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0181966