Revisiting HISTALP precipitation dataset

The article presents a recent update of a comprehensive dataset of long‐term series of precipitation data from instrumental observations in the Greater Alpine Region (GAR), that is, the region of Europe including the Alpine mountain range and their nearer surroundings (4°–19° E in longitude and 43°–...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2023-12, Vol.43 (15), p.7381-7411
Hauptverfasser: Chimani, Barbara, Bochníček, Oliver, Brunetti, Michele, Ganekind, Manfred, Holec, Juraj, Izsák, Beatrix, Lakatos, Mónika, Tadić, Melita Perčec, Manara, Veronica, Maugeri, Maurizio, Šťastný, Pavel, Szentes, Olivér, Zardi, Dino
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article presents a recent update of a comprehensive dataset of long‐term series of precipitation data from instrumental observations in the Greater Alpine Region (GAR), that is, the region of Europe including the Alpine mountain range and their nearer surroundings (4°–19° E in longitude and 43°–49° N in latitude). A comparison to different national homogenized datasets is also presented. Results show that in the national homogenized datasets more breaks have been detected due to higher station density. They also demonstrate the necessity of constant exchange with data providers. The resulting trends in all datasets are mainly weak and only a minority of them is statistically significant. In most cases the similarity of statistical index numbers are promising, with, for example, small RMSE between the presented new HISTALP homogenization and the time series of the national homogenized datasets. Nevertheless, for some stations higher differences occur and break signals are not what would be expected due to possible causes in the station history. The differences between the national and the HISTALP new homogenization—due to, for example, different methods used, different points in time when the homogenization took place, different options of data handling (combination of station data, gap filling routines, …) and different reference stations—illustrate the inherent uncertainty unavoidably associated to homogenization and point out the need of careful communication and use of the data. On the other hand, the results highlight the advantage of consistently homogenized datasets, versus the risks associated with mixing results from different homogenizations. A rehomogenization of HISTALP precipitation datasets was executed and the results compared to the former version and national homogenized datasets. The comparison covered breaks, trends, RMSE and MSESS and showed mostly good agreement with differences, for example, caused by different homogenization methods and availability of reference stations but also different data sources.
ISSN:0899-8418
1097-0088
DOI:10.1002/joc.8270