Chlorhexidine MICs Remain Stable Among Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Isolates Collected from 2005 to 2019 at Three US Sites

Background: Chlorhexidine bathing reduces bacterial skin colonization and prevents infections in specific patient populations. As chlorhexidine use becomes more widespread, concerns about bacterial tolerance to chlorhexidine have increased; however, testing for chlorhexidine minimum inhibitory conce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s26-s26
Hauptverfasser: Lutgring, Joseph, Grass, Julian, Lonsway, David, Yoo, Brian, Epson, Erin, Crumpler, Megan, Galliher, Karen, Zahn, Matthew, Evans, Eric, Jacob, Jesse, Page, Alexander, Satola, Sarah, Smith, Gillian, Kainer, Marion, Hayden, Mary, Reddy, Sujan, Elkins, Christopher, Magill, Shelley, Guh, Alice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Chlorhexidine bathing reduces bacterial skin colonization and prevents infections in specific patient populations. As chlorhexidine use becomes more widespread, concerns about bacterial tolerance to chlorhexidine have increased; however, testing for chlorhexidine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) is challenging. We adapted a broth microdilution (BMD) method to determine whether chlorhexidine MICs changed over time among 4 important healthcare-associated pathogens. Methods: Antibiotic-resistant bacterial isolates (S taphylococcus aureus from 2005 to 2019 and Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Enterobacter cloacae complex from 2011 to 2019) were collected through Emerging Infections Program surveillance in 2 sites (Georgia and Tennessee) or through public health reporting in 1 site (Orange County, California). A convenience sample of isolates were collected from facilities with varying amounts of chlorhexidine use. We performed BMD testing using laboratory-developed panels with chlorhexidine digluconate concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 64 μg/mL. After successfully establishing reproducibility with quality control organisms, 3 laboratories performed MIC testing. For each organism, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) were established using ECOFFinder. Results: Among 538 isolates tested (129 S. aureus , 158 E. coli , 142 K. pneumoniae , and 109 E. cloacae complex), S. aureus , E. coli , K. pneumoniae , and E. cloacae complex ECVs were 8, 4, 64, and 64 µg/mL, respectively (Table 1). Moreover, 14 isolates had an MIC above the ECV (12 E. coli and 2 E. cloacae complex). The MIC 50 of each species is reported over time (Table 2). Conclusions: Using an adapted BMD method, we found that chlorhexidine MICs did not increase over time among a limited sample of S. aureus , E. coli , K. pneumoniae , and E. cloacae complex isolates. Although these results are reassuring, continued surveillance for elevated chlorhexidine MICs in isolates from patients with well-characterized chlorhexidine exposure is needed as chlorhexidine use increases. Funding: None Disclosures: None
ISSN:0899-823X
1559-6834
DOI:10.1017/ice.2020.503