Important distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 for use in impact assessments

Important distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 for use in impact assessments

Recent criticisms have suggested that future emissions are unlikely to lead to the warmest climate scenario available (SSP5–8.5), which has resulted in the second highest scenario (SSP3–7.0) receiving increased attention. The distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 has not been well recognized, but it is releva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature climate change 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1276-1278
Hauptverfasser: Shiogama, Hideo, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Hayashi, Michiya, Hirabayashi, Yukiko, Ogura, Tomoo, Iizumi, Toshichika, Takahashi, Kiyoshi, Takemura, Toshihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
704/106/694/2739
704/106/694/2786
704/106/694/682
Aerosols
Climate Change
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Comment
Earth and Environmental Science
Emissions
Environment
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice
Impact assessment
Interdisciplinary aspects
Investigations
Precipitation
Radiation
Simulation
Trends
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent criticisms have suggested that future emissions are unlikely to lead to the warmest climate scenario available (SSP5–8.5), which has resulted in the second highest scenario (SSP3–7.0) receiving increased attention. The distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 has not been well recognized, but it is relevant for the proper interpretation of studies that use this scenario.
ISSN:1758-678X
1758-6798
DOI:10.1038/s41558-023-01883-2