OPERATIONAL RISK AND THE NEW CAREMARK LIABILITY FOR BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
This paper identifies a new and previously unidentified trend changing corporate governance: board liability for misconduct based on operational risk. Operational risk is serious business. When boards slumber, hundreds of people die in airline accidents, pipeline explosions cause massive environment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Boston University law review 2023-10, Vol.103 (6), p.1539-1590 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper identifies a new and previously unidentified trend changing corporate governance: board liability for misconduct based on operational risk. Operational risk is serious business. When boards slumber, hundreds of people die in airline accidents, pipeline explosions cause massive environmental damage, and mine collapses leave families with grief unimaginable. These and other corporate disasters were entirely preventable, but board members were asleep at the wheel while the conditions were set for disaster. This Article argues that courts are only now starting to fully recognize the peril of operational risk as a source of liability for boards of directors. Operational misconduct should take center stage alongside financial mismanagement as a critical source of director liability. After closely reviewing the key cases, this Article shows how operational risk heralds a fundamental shift in the way boards respond to monitoring the firm. This Article also identifies how subtle changes in judicial doctrine are changing the way boards manage operational risk, avoid liability, and protect the lives of stakeholders of the company and society at large. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-8047 |