Passive vs. unaccusative predicates: A phase-based account
This research article provides evidence from Jordanian Arabic (JA) that passive predicates, unlike unaccusative predicates, project phases. Two tests are formulated to demonstrate this difference, namely long-distance agreement (between T 0 and the internal argument) and quantifier stranding. Follow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural language and linguistic theory 2023-11, Vol.41 (4), p.1397-1424 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This research article provides evidence from Jordanian Arabic (JA) that passive predicates, unlike unaccusative predicates, project phases. Two tests are formulated to demonstrate this difference, namely long-distance agreement (between T
0
and the internal argument) and quantifier stranding. Following Alexiadou et al. (
2006
), Alexiadou and Doron (
2012
) and Bruening (
2013
), we attribute this difference between passive and unaccusative predicates to the presence of Voice Phrase in the former but not the latter. In so doing, this article challenges a number of assumptions that equally qualify passive and unaccusative predicates as phases, or lack thereof, in natural languages (see e.g., Chomsky
2000
; Legate
2003
; Centeno and Vicente
2008
; Deal
2009
). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-806X 1573-0859 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11049-023-09568-3 |