Passive vs. unaccusative predicates: A phase-based account

This research article provides evidence from Jordanian Arabic (JA) that passive predicates, unlike unaccusative predicates, project phases. Two tests are formulated to demonstrate this difference, namely long-distance agreement (between T 0 and the internal argument) and quantifier stranding. Follow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural language and linguistic theory 2023-11, Vol.41 (4), p.1397-1424
1. Verfasser: Jarrah, Marwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This research article provides evidence from Jordanian Arabic (JA) that passive predicates, unlike unaccusative predicates, project phases. Two tests are formulated to demonstrate this difference, namely long-distance agreement (between T 0 and the internal argument) and quantifier stranding. Following Alexiadou et al. ( 2006 ), Alexiadou and Doron ( 2012 ) and Bruening ( 2013 ), we attribute this difference between passive and unaccusative predicates to the presence of Voice Phrase in the former but not the latter. In so doing, this article challenges a number of assumptions that equally qualify passive and unaccusative predicates as phases, or lack thereof, in natural languages (see e.g., Chomsky 2000 ; Legate 2003 ; Centeno and Vicente 2008 ; Deal 2009 ).
ISSN:0167-806X
1573-0859
DOI:10.1007/s11049-023-09568-3