The use of low‐density polyethylene‐molybdenum oxide polymer composites as radiation shielding laminates in dental radiology physical structures
Radiation protection is crucial in the protection of humans from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. One of the most reliable ways of reducing the risk of occupationally exposed workers and the public in dental radiology is the installation of an effective radiation shielding barrier at the f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied polymer science 2023-12, Vol.140 (47) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Radiation protection is crucial in the protection of humans from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. One of the most reliable ways of reducing the risk of occupationally exposed workers and the public in dental radiology is the installation of an effective radiation shielding barrier at the facility. Concrete barriers are predominantly used for dental shielding, however there is need to consider the use of lighter, ready‐made, and lower half value layer (HVL) materials as shielding materials in dental radiology facilities. In this work, low‐density polyethylene‐molybdenum oxide polymer composites were prepared (85C2H4‐15MoO3, 90C2H4‐10MoO3, and 95C2H4‐5MoO3), and the radiation attenuation measurements were carried out experimentally. The composites displayed acceptable x‐ray absorbing capabilities. 85C2H4‐15MoO3 polymer composite (DT1) showed optimal shielding in comparison with concrete. DT1 has an approximate HVL like concrete while it is 54.3% lighter than concrete. 85C2H4‐15MoO3 polymer composite is 1.5%, 0.8%, and 6.3% higher in linear attenuation coefficient than concrete at 60, 70, and 80 kVps, respectively. This implies that DT1 can effectively replace concrete at dental diagnostic energies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8995 1097-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1002/app.54701 |