Comparison of Turbulence Methods for a Stepped Spillway Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is used effectively in hydraulic engineering and many other sciences. However, determining which turbulence model is suitable for the analysis requires further investigation. This study aims to show which turbulence method is closer to the actual data in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Iranian journal of science and technology. Transactions of civil engineering 2023-12, Vol.47 (6), p.3895-3911
Hauptverfasser: Yalcin, Eyyup Ensar, Ikinciogullari, Erdinc, Kaya, Nihat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is used effectively in hydraulic engineering and many other sciences. However, determining which turbulence model is suitable for the analysis requires further investigation. This study aims to show which turbulence method is closer to the actual data in calculating parameters, such as velocity, water surface profile, and pressure, frequently encountered in CFD engineering. For this purpose, the discharge-water level, pressure, energy dissipation rate, and velocity profile were investigated using different turbulence models ( k – ε , k – ω , large eddy simulation [LES], renormalization group [RNG]). Then the results were compared with the physical results of stepped spillways. According to the results, the most compatible turbulence model in the discharge-water level relationship is k – ω ; the most compatible turbulence model is k – ε for pressure, energy dissipation rates, and approach channel velocities; and lastly, the most compatible turbulence model was LES for water surface profiles. The results obtained are expected to be a reference for researchers who will work in this field.
ISSN:2228-6160
2364-1843
DOI:10.1007/s40996-023-01127-5