Latent Hazard Notification for Highly Automated Driving: Expected Safety Benefits and Driver Behavioral Adaptation

Although latent hazard notification for highly automated driving is expected to enhance traffic safety, its practical effects have yet to be verified. This study systemically investigated the expected safety benefits and driver behavioral adaptation based on structural equation modeling. First, we developed a notification system to inform drivers of latent hazards with auditory alerts and conducted a driving simulation experiment involving eyes-off-road situations. To test the system, we adopted two types of events (i.e., the collision avoidance function working or failure) in which latent hazards transform into immediate risks. Then, a measurement model was developed to evaluate driver trust, driver attention, and traffic safety. Subsequently, we examined the corresponding causal relationships. On the one hand, latent hazard notification significantly improves driver attention (i.e., more fixations on latent hazards, less engagement in non-driving-related tasks, and faster notice of immediate risks), which significantly enhances traffic safety. On the other hand, latent hazard notification significantly increases driver trust, which lowers driver attention and consequently impairs traffic safety. This causality reveals driver behavioral adaptation, although driver trust does not directly affect traffic safety. Overall, we find that latent hazard notification for highly automated driving can improve traffic safety, but the consequent driver behavioral adaptation impairs 15.12% of the expected safety benefits.