On Comparison of 3D-Printed ABS and PVDF-Based Sensors for Body-Centric Utility
The 3D-printed MPA of 1° recycled PVDF and ABS provides an option to develop greener sensors for various engineering applications. But hitherto little has been reported on the comparison of 3D-printed 1° recycled ABS and PVDF-based sensors for body-centric utility in the vicinity of 2.45 GHz. This s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011) 2023-09, Vol.48 (9), p.12645-12655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The 3D-printed MPA of 1° recycled PVDF and ABS provides an option to develop greener sensors for various engineering applications. But hitherto little has been reported on the comparison of 3D-printed 1° recycled ABS and PVDF-based sensors for body-centric utility in the vicinity of 2.45 GHz. This study highlights the comparative analysis of 1° recycled ABS and PVDF sensors (based on mechanical, piezoelectric, and RF characterization). The study suggests that 1° recycled PVDF (having ε
r
2 and tan
δ
0.005)-based sensors have multiband resonance at 2.45 GHz, 5 GHz, and 5.5 GHz with appreciable return loss as compared to ABS (ε
r
3 and tan
δ
0.001). For body-centric utility (wearability in terms of SAR value (0.22 W/kg for PVDF and 0.642 W/kg for ABS at 2.45 GHz) and flexibility), 1° recycled PVDF sensor was observed better than 1° recycled ABS. Overall due to better piezoelectric (d
33
0.5 pC/N), mechanical (MOT 18.30 MPa), and RF characteristics, 1° recycled PVDF-based sensors may be considered a better solution for flexible and pressure-sensitive body-centric applications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-567X 1319-8025 2191-4281 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13369-023-07658-3 |