1342-P: Are Plasma Aminotransferases of Value in Screening Patients with T2DM for NAFLD or Fibrosis?

The ADA recommends to screen for NASH and liver fibrosis individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), obesity (OB) and/or elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). However, recent studies have questioned the clinical value of measuring ALT and AST for the detection of patients at risk of nonalcoholic fat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-06, Vol.72 (Supplement_1), p.1
Hauptverfasser: ORTIZ ROCHA, ANDREA, GODINEZ LEIVA, EDDISON, KALAVALAPALLI, SRILAXMI, LOMONACO, ROMINA, SHETTY, SHWETHA S., MARANGI, STEPHEN A., VALDEZ SAENZ, ENRIQUE, SHRESTHA, SULAV, GONZALEZ, MARIA A., CHI, XIAOFEI, GURKA, MATTHEW J., BARB, DIANA, CUSI, KENNETH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The ADA recommends to screen for NASH and liver fibrosis individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), obesity (OB) and/or elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). However, recent studies have questioned the clinical value of measuring ALT and AST for the detection of patients at risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of ALT and AST ≥40 IU/L, or their lower cut-offs ≥30 IU/L as recommended by recent AACE guidelines, to screen populations at risk. To this end, we recruited 714 participants (age: 56 ± 11 years, male: 42%; BMI: 30.8 ± 6.5 kg/m2; T2DM: 35%; A1c: 6.0 ± 1.2%) from primary care or endocrinology clinics, unaware of having NAFLD/fibrosis. Screening for NAFLD included laboratory tests and imaging with elastography (steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter [CAP]; fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement [LSM]). Elevated transaminases were more common in patients with vs. without T2DM, with ALT ≥40 IU/L occurring in 13% vs. 8% and AST in 9% vs. 3% of patients (both p
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db23-1342-P