1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a lar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-06, Vol.72 (Supplement_1), p.1
Hauptverfasser: SASTRY, SHRUTI, COREN, MORGAN, SCHREIBER, JUSTIN, LIBMAN, INGRID
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 1
container_title Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 72
creator SASTRY, SHRUTI
COREN, MORGAN
SCHREIBER, JUSTIN
LIBMAN, INGRID
description The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a large academic pediatric diabetes center as part of clinical care as well as to evaluate the prevalence of DEB and identify clinical factors (in particular, use of pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM)) associated with a positive screen. Youth with T1D between 13-19 years, seen in our pediatric diabetes clinic from 02/09/2022 - 06/07/2022, were given the survey. A total of 580 subjects were eligible for the screening, 368 (64%) completed it and 282 (~50%) had analyzable data (49% female, 83% white, 11% black, 3% reporting food insecurity (FI), mean (SD) age 16.4±1.9 years, HbA1c 8.2±1.9%, BMI percentile 71.2±26.9). The majority were on CGM (77%) and 45% on pump therapy (including 5% on hybrid close loop systems). A total of 43 (15%) had a positive screen (score≥ 20) for DEB. There was a higher proportion of females, (67 vs 45%, p=0.007) lower proportion of white (70 vs 85%) and higher proportion of black youth (20 vs 8%) (p=0.02) in those that screened positive vs negative. Those with a positive screen also had a higher HbA1c (9.9±2.1 vs 8±1.7, p
doi_str_mv 10.2337/db23-1135-P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2849359229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2849359229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c649-c17bd3acfd2607705d76b8e0f2925622e553784c2a39ab254531b52033cb68623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1KAzEQgIMoWKsnXyDgUVaTyWaz8aa1VaFowR70FJLsrN1Sd2uyVXrzIXxCn8RdKgMzMHzzw0fIKWcXIIS6LByIhHMhk9keGXAtdCJAveyTAWMcEq60OiRHMS4ZY1kXA7LY0Vf02QfEuqrfaNkEelvFJhQYsKBj2_bdG1zYz6oJkVY1fW027YJ-VV2ab9dIeTdgHbYYf79_Jmhj5VZIbV3QR_QYow3bY3JQ2lXEk_86JPPJeD66T6ZPdw-j62nis1QnnitXCOvLAjKmFJOFylyOrAQNMgNAKYXKUw9WaOtAplJwJ4EJ4V2WZyCG5Gy3dh2ajw3G1iybTai7iwbyVAupAXRHne8oH5oYA5ZmHar37kvDmelNmt6k6d2YmfgDUcdk9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2849359229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>SASTRY, SHRUTI ; COREN, MORGAN ; SCHREIBER, JUSTIN ; LIBMAN, INGRID</creator><creatorcontrib>SASTRY, SHRUTI ; COREN, MORGAN ; SCHREIBER, JUSTIN ; LIBMAN, INGRID</creatorcontrib><description>The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a large academic pediatric diabetes center as part of clinical care as well as to evaluate the prevalence of DEB and identify clinical factors (in particular, use of pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM)) associated with a positive screen. Youth with T1D between 13-19 years, seen in our pediatric diabetes clinic from 02/09/2022 - 06/07/2022, were given the survey. A total of 580 subjects were eligible for the screening, 368 (64%) completed it and 282 (~50%) had analyzable data (49% female, 83% white, 11% black, 3% reporting food insecurity (FI), mean (SD) age 16.4±1.9 years, HbA1c 8.2±1.9%, BMI percentile 71.2±26.9). The majority were on CGM (77%) and 45% on pump therapy (including 5% on hybrid close loop systems). A total of 43 (15%) had a positive screen (score≥ 20) for DEB. There was a higher proportion of females, (67 vs 45%, p=0.007) lower proportion of white (70 vs 85%) and higher proportion of black youth (20 vs 8%) (p=0.02) in those that screened positive vs negative. Those with a positive screen also had a higher HbA1c (9.9±2.1 vs 8±1.7, p&lt;0.001) and BMI percentile (83.1±21.1 vs 68.9±27.3, p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in age (16.5±1.9 vs 16.4±1.9 years, p=0.82), report of FI (4.6 vs 2.1%, p=0.76), use of CGM (72 vs 78%, p=0.35), or pump therapy (35 vs 44%, p-0.26) between the two groups. None of those on hybrid close loop had a positive screen, however the numbers were small (n=7). Almost 1 in 5 adolescents with T1D had a positive screen for DEB. There was no difference in the use of diabetes technology. Our findings stress the importance of screening for DEB in youth with T1D and implementation of strategies to improve response rate in order to make timely referrals to reduce associated morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-327X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/db23-1135-P</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent) ; Eating behavior ; Food security ; Morbidity ; Pediatrics ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2023-06, Vol.72 (Supplement_1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SASTRY, SHRUTI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COREN, MORGAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHREIBER, JUSTIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIBMAN, INGRID</creatorcontrib><title>1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary</title><title>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a large academic pediatric diabetes center as part of clinical care as well as to evaluate the prevalence of DEB and identify clinical factors (in particular, use of pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM)) associated with a positive screen. Youth with T1D between 13-19 years, seen in our pediatric diabetes clinic from 02/09/2022 - 06/07/2022, were given the survey. A total of 580 subjects were eligible for the screening, 368 (64%) completed it and 282 (~50%) had analyzable data (49% female, 83% white, 11% black, 3% reporting food insecurity (FI), mean (SD) age 16.4±1.9 years, HbA1c 8.2±1.9%, BMI percentile 71.2±26.9). The majority were on CGM (77%) and 45% on pump therapy (including 5% on hybrid close loop systems). A total of 43 (15%) had a positive screen (score≥ 20) for DEB. There was a higher proportion of females, (67 vs 45%, p=0.007) lower proportion of white (70 vs 85%) and higher proportion of black youth (20 vs 8%) (p=0.02) in those that screened positive vs negative. Those with a positive screen also had a higher HbA1c (9.9±2.1 vs 8±1.7, p&lt;0.001) and BMI percentile (83.1±21.1 vs 68.9±27.3, p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in age (16.5±1.9 vs 16.4±1.9 years, p=0.82), report of FI (4.6 vs 2.1%, p=0.76), use of CGM (72 vs 78%, p=0.35), or pump therapy (35 vs 44%, p-0.26) between the two groups. None of those on hybrid close loop had a positive screen, however the numbers were small (n=7). Almost 1 in 5 adolescents with T1D had a positive screen for DEB. There was no difference in the use of diabetes technology. Our findings stress the importance of screening for DEB in youth with T1D and implementation of strategies to improve response rate in order to make timely referrals to reduce associated morbidity.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0012-1797</issn><issn>1939-327X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1KAzEQgIMoWKsnXyDgUVaTyWaz8aa1VaFowR70FJLsrN1Sd2uyVXrzIXxCn8RdKgMzMHzzw0fIKWcXIIS6LByIhHMhk9keGXAtdCJAveyTAWMcEq60OiRHMS4ZY1kXA7LY0Vf02QfEuqrfaNkEelvFJhQYsKBj2_bdG1zYz6oJkVY1fW027YJ-VV2ab9dIeTdgHbYYf79_Jmhj5VZIbV3QR_QYow3bY3JQ2lXEk_86JPPJeD66T6ZPdw-j62nis1QnnitXCOvLAjKmFJOFylyOrAQNMgNAKYXKUw9WaOtAplJwJ4EJ4V2WZyCG5Gy3dh2ajw3G1iybTai7iwbyVAupAXRHne8oH5oYA5ZmHar37kvDmelNmt6k6d2YmfgDUcdk9w</recordid><startdate>20230620</startdate><enddate>20230620</enddate><creator>SASTRY, SHRUTI</creator><creator>COREN, MORGAN</creator><creator>SCHREIBER, JUSTIN</creator><creator>LIBMAN, INGRID</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230620</creationdate><title>1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary</title><author>SASTRY, SHRUTI ; COREN, MORGAN ; SCHREIBER, JUSTIN ; LIBMAN, INGRID</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c649-c17bd3acfd2607705d76b8e0f2925622e553784c2a39ab254531b52033cb68623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SASTRY, SHRUTI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COREN, MORGAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHREIBER, JUSTIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIBMAN, INGRID</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SASTRY, SHRUTI</au><au>COREN, MORGAN</au><au>SCHREIBER, JUSTIN</au><au>LIBMAN, INGRID</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2023-06-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0012-1797</issn><eissn>1939-327X</eissn><abstract>The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a large academic pediatric diabetes center as part of clinical care as well as to evaluate the prevalence of DEB and identify clinical factors (in particular, use of pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM)) associated with a positive screen. Youth with T1D between 13-19 years, seen in our pediatric diabetes clinic from 02/09/2022 - 06/07/2022, were given the survey. A total of 580 subjects were eligible for the screening, 368 (64%) completed it and 282 (~50%) had analyzable data (49% female, 83% white, 11% black, 3% reporting food insecurity (FI), mean (SD) age 16.4±1.9 years, HbA1c 8.2±1.9%, BMI percentile 71.2±26.9). The majority were on CGM (77%) and 45% on pump therapy (including 5% on hybrid close loop systems). A total of 43 (15%) had a positive screen (score≥ 20) for DEB. There was a higher proportion of females, (67 vs 45%, p=0.007) lower proportion of white (70 vs 85%) and higher proportion of black youth (20 vs 8%) (p=0.02) in those that screened positive vs negative. Those with a positive screen also had a higher HbA1c (9.9±2.1 vs 8±1.7, p&lt;0.001) and BMI percentile (83.1±21.1 vs 68.9±27.3, p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in age (16.5±1.9 vs 16.4±1.9 years, p=0.82), report of FI (4.6 vs 2.1%, p=0.76), use of CGM (72 vs 78%, p=0.35), or pump therapy (35 vs 44%, p-0.26) between the two groups. None of those on hybrid close loop had a positive screen, however the numbers were small (n=7). Almost 1 in 5 adolescents with T1D had a positive screen for DEB. There was no difference in the use of diabetes technology. Our findings stress the importance of screening for DEB in youth with T1D and implementation of strategies to improve response rate in order to make timely referrals to reduce associated morbidity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/db23-1135-P</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1797
ispartof Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2023-06, Vol.72 (Supplement_1), p.1
issn 0012-1797
1939-327X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2849359229
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescents
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)
Eating behavior
Food security
Morbidity
Pediatrics
Surveys
title 1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1135-P:%20Screening%20for%20Disordered%20Eating%20Behaviors%20in%20Youth%20with%20Type%201%20Diabetes%E2%80%94Feasible%20and%20Necessary&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=SASTRY,%20SHRUTI&rft.date=2023-06-20&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0012-1797&rft.eissn=1939-327X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/db23-1135-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2849359229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2849359229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true