1135-P: Screening for Disordered Eating Behaviors in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes—Feasible and Necessary
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a lar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-06, Vol.72 (Supplement_1), p.1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) for disordered eating behaviors (DEB) using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) tool, however this is not routinely done in clinical practice. We implemented screening for DEB in a large academic pediatric diabetes center as part of clinical care as well as to evaluate the prevalence of DEB and identify clinical factors (in particular, use of pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM)) associated with a positive screen. Youth with T1D between 13-19 years, seen in our pediatric diabetes clinic from 02/09/2022 - 06/07/2022, were given the survey. A total of 580 subjects were eligible for the screening, 368 (64%) completed it and 282 (~50%) had analyzable data (49% female, 83% white, 11% black, 3% reporting food insecurity (FI), mean (SD) age 16.4±1.9 years, HbA1c 8.2±1.9%, BMI percentile 71.2±26.9). The majority were on CGM (77%) and 45% on pump therapy (including 5% on hybrid close loop systems). A total of 43 (15%) had a positive screen (score≥ 20) for DEB. There was a higher proportion of females, (67 vs 45%, p=0.007) lower proportion of white (70 vs 85%) and higher proportion of black youth (20 vs 8%) (p=0.02) in those that screened positive vs negative. Those with a positive screen also had a higher HbA1c (9.9±2.1 vs 8±1.7, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/db23-1135-P |