Clusternets: A deep learning approach to probe clustering dark energy

Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are becoming popular in cosmology for extracting valuable information from cosmological data. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on matter density snapshots to distinguish clustering Dark Energy (DE) from the co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-08
Hauptverfasser: Chegeni, Amirmohammad, Hassani, Farbod, Alireza Vafaei Sadr, Khosravi, Nima, Kunz, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are becoming popular in cosmology for extracting valuable information from cosmological data. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on matter density snapshots to distinguish clustering Dark Energy (DE) from the cosmological constant scenario and to detect the speed of sound (\(c_s\)) associated with clustering DE. We compare the CNN results with those from a Random Forest (RF) algorithm trained on power spectra. Varying the dark energy equation of state parameter \(w_{\rm{DE}}\) within the range of -0.7 to -0.99, while keeping \(c_s^2 = 1\), we find that the CNN approach results in a significant improvement in accuracy over the RF algorithm. The improvement in classification accuracy can be as high as \(40\%\) depending on the physical scales involved. We also investigate the ML algorithms' ability to detect the impact of the speed of sound by choosing \(c_s^2\) from the set \(\{1, 10^{-2}, 10^{-4}, 10^{-7}\}\) while maintaining a constant \(w_{\rm DE}\) for three different cases: \(w_{\rm DE} \in \{-0.7, -0.8, -0.9\}\). Our results suggest that distinguishing between various values of \(c_s^2\) and the case where \(c_s^2=1\) is challenging, particularly at small scales and when \(w_{\rm{DE}}\approx -1\). However, as we consider larger scales, the accuracy of \(c_s^2\) detection improves. Notably, the CNN algorithm consistently outperforms the RF algorithm, leading to an approximate \(20\%\) enhancement in \(c_s^2\) detection accuracy in some cases.
ISSN:2331-8422