New clinical data on the prophylaxis of infections in abdominal, gynecologic, and urologic surgery
Two dose schedules of the antibiotic cefotaxime were compared in a prospective, randomized 226-center study of 3,670 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecologic, and urologic surgery. Schedule A consisted of a single preoperative dose and schedule B consisted of one preoperative dose followed by two...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1992-10, Vol.164 (4), p.16S-20S |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two dose schedules of the antibiotic cefotaxime were compared in a prospective, randomized 226-center study of 3,670 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecologic, and urologic surgery. Schedule A consisted of a single preoperative dose and schedule B consisted of one preoperative dose followed by two postoperative doses. There was no significant difference in the frequency of wound infection or bacteriuria between the two schedules. Schedule B was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative pyrexia, further antibiotic therapy, local side effects, and extended hospital stay. One dose probably has less impact on the intestinal flora. Therefore, single-dose cefotaxime is as effective and less costly when compared with multiple-dose cefotaxime for common surgical procedures lasting less than 3 hours. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80052-8 |