Detection of squamous neoplasia by fluorescence imaging comparing porfimer sodium fluorescence to tissue autofluorescence in the hamster cheek-pouch model

Background: Early neoplastic changes in the oral cavity may be difficult to detect. Fluorescence imaging using porphyrin-derived drugs has been used to enhance detection of neoplasia. Autofluorescence has also been used for this purpose. This paper compares autofluorescence to porfimer sodium-induce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1995-11, Vol.170 (5), p.423-426
Hauptverfasser: Pathak, Irvin, Davis, Noelle L., Hsiang, York N., Quenville, Noel F., Palcic, Branko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Early neoplastic changes in the oral cavity may be difficult to detect. Fluorescence imaging using porphyrin-derived drugs has been used to enhance detection of neoplasia. Autofluorescence has also been used for this purpose. This paper compares autofluorescence to porfimer sodium-induced fluorescence in the detection of neoplasia in the hamster cheek-pouch model. Materials and methods: Neoplasia was induced in the hamster cheek pouch by the application of 9, 10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene. Animals were imaged either with injection of drug (porfimer sodium) or without drug (autofluorescence). Imaging was carried out using a laser-induced fluorescence detection system. Biopies were performed on imaged sections and histologic grades were assigned. Results: Porfimer sodium fluorescence provided 100% sensitivity and specificity in detection of neoplasia. The sensitivity and specificity with autofluorescence was 76% and 83%, respectively. Conclusions: Autofluorescence provides an accurate means of detecting early neoplastic changes in the hamster cheek-pouch model; however, porfimer sodium imaging does improve detection rates.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80321-3