Effectiveness of the use of agricultural inputs to reduce environmental pollution in Indonesia

Agriculture is a sector that is still promising in Indonesia. It can absorb labor, thus becoming a relatively high food source for Indonesian people on rice consumption. Become a supporter of Regional Indigenous Income (PAD) in cities and regencies. Nevertheless, the Government of Indonesia still lacks environmental sustainability. There is a tendency for the agricultural sector’s contribution to decrease because of the government’s minor alignment in the farm sector, the inefficiency of overlapping fertilizer use, and the transfer of land functions. On the other hand, due to the high consumption of rice, efforts to increase production impact environmental damage due to the agricultural sector. Research data using FAO secondary data from 1970 to 2017 includes data on economic growth (GDP), rice crop, rice production, government expenditure (Investment), Co2, Pesticides, NPK fertilizer, and urea fertilizer. Data used only 48 less than 100 then used Smart PLS analysis. The results showed that the Indonesian government did not affect rice production with a value of 0.774, Pesticides had no effect on rice production with a p-value of 0.795, and pesticides also did not affect environmental pollution with a value of P-value of 0.060. Urea fertilizer did not affect output with a P-value of 0.356,but it did not affect co2 intensity. Variable rice harvesting land affects co2 power, meaning environmental pollution caused by rice harvesting land, but rice harvesting land affects rice production. NPK fertilizer affects production.