Ecogeomorphic interactions of Russian olives (Elaeagnus angustifolia) and point‐bar morphology along Powder River, Montana, USA
Point bars are crucial alluvial features that help sustain meandering river ecosystems. They are influenced by interactions among physical processes and biological components, such as riparian vegetation. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these interactions can inform management decisions. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2023-07, Vol.39 (6), p.1094-1109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Point bars are crucial alluvial features that help sustain meandering river ecosystems. They are influenced by interactions among physical processes and biological components, such as riparian vegetation. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these interactions can inform management decisions. The meandering Powder River in southeastern Montana, USA, provides a valuable study system for fluvial interactions because it has no major human alterations. Riparian stands of non‐native Russian olive trees (Elaeagnus angustifolia) became noticeable after ~50‐year flood in 1978. Fortuitously, 20 channel cross‐sections had been established in 1975 and 1977 and have been surveyed periodically ever since. This temporally extensive dataset was coupled with a spatially extensive dataset of 85 point‐bar cross‐sections derived from high‐resolution LiDAR that enabled evaluation of interactions between Russian olives and point‐bar morphology through time and space. Based on published literature and field observations, we hypothesised that an increase in the width of Russian olive stands would result in (1) a decrease in the overall point‐bar slope, (2) an increase in point‐bar heights and (3) in point‐bar toe‐slopes. The results indicated that point‐bar slopes did decrease with an increase in stand width, supporting the first hypothesis (R2 = 0.87). However, point‐bar heights decreased with an increase in stand width (R2 = 0.63), contradicting the second hypothesis and there was no relation between point‐bar toe‐slopes and stand width (R2 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
DOI: | 10.1002/rra.4139 |