Adaptive fuzzy PID control based on nonlinear disturbance observer for quadrotor

In this paper, the composite control of position and orientation of the quadrotor for tracking purposes are investigated. The quadrotor is an underactuated nonlinear system. So, based on the introduced virtual inputs the quadrotor is transformed into an actuated system. External disturbances and dif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vibration and control 2023-07, Vol.29 (13-14), p.2965-2977
Hauptverfasser: Ghasemi, Ali, Azimi, Mohammad M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, the composite control of position and orientation of the quadrotor for tracking purposes are investigated. The quadrotor is an underactuated nonlinear system. So, based on the introduced virtual inputs the quadrotor is transformed into an actuated system. External disturbances and different sources of uncertainty such as input saturation are considered in the dynamic model of the quadrotor. Also, after transform implementation, some complicated terms appear which are considered as other sources of uncertainty. To guarantee the stabilization and tracking goals of the quadrotor in the perturbed model, the composite adaptive fuzzy PID-Like controller is proposed. This controller consists of three parts where the innovation of the paper appears in all terms. The main term is an adaptive fuzzy PID-like controller which able to approximate the coefficients of PID based on the decentralized fuzzy logic. Then, a H∞ compensator based on a modified Riccati-like equation is presented; which can attenuate the fuzzy approximation errors. Also, as the last term of the composite controller, the modified disturbance observer is designed that estimates the uncertainty and disturbance. The experimental result shows that the proposed method leads to resilient stabilization and tracking in comparison with conventional methods.
ISSN:1077-5463
1741-2986
DOI:10.1177/10775463221089734