IDDF2023-ABS-0128 Ct-based nomogram development and validation to predict SSTR2, VEGFR2, and mgmt expression for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BackgroundTo establish and validate a model to predict somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) based on computed tomography (CT) images.Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2023-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 1), p.A200-A201
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Xiaoqi, Song, Chenyu, Li, Lujie, Wang, Yangdi, Feng, Shi-Ting, Luo, Yanji, Peng, Zhenpeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundTo establish and validate a model to predict somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) based on computed tomography (CT) images.MethodsData from 85 patients with 88 pathologically confirmed pNENs, who underwent contrast-enhanced CT before radical resection, were retrospectively collected. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for SSTR2 (n=86), VEGFR2 (n=53), and MGMT (n=84) expressions. The CT features were evaluated by two radiologists. The patients were randomly divided into training and test datasets for each immunohistochemical group. Nomograms were developed based on CT features associated with these immunohistochemical expressions in the training sets, which were subsequently validated and evaluated.ResultsSex, tumour boundary, and location showed a statistically significant difference between the SSTR2 positive and negative groups; sex, maximum tumour diameter, boundary, the enhanced ratio in the venous phase, and CT ratio in arterial and venous phases were statistically different between the VEGFR2 positive and negative groups; maximum tumour diameter, boundary, shape, CT ratio in unenhanced, arterial, and venous phases, and enhanced ratio in the arterial phase were statistically different between the MGMT positive and negative groups (P
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-IDDF.189