The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace
This paper argues that peace studies and the Welsh school of critical security studies both define themselves in opposition to the traditional view of security, with the only difference that the former goes through the concept of peace in voicing its critique of security. Pointing to some striking s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International politics (Hague, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2023-06, Vol.60 (3), p.554-571 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 571 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 554 |
| container_title | International politics (Hague, Netherlands) |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Rolf, Jan Niklas |
| description | This paper argues that peace studies and the Welsh school of critical security studies both define themselves in opposition to the traditional view of security, with the only difference that the former goes through the concept of peace in voicing its critique of security. Pointing to some striking similarities in the epistemology, methodology and ontology of Johan Galtung and Ken Booth, it shows that the two studies have been driving on parallel roads and that they would profit greatly from joining forces. Being the kind of applied and anti-hegemonic science that scholars at Aberystwyth strive for, peace studies could provide the Welsh school with greater practical applicability and access to everyday life. The Welsh school, in turn, could endow peace studies with academic reputation and a solid critical foundation. This would not only put peace back on the agenda of IR, but also contribute towards the decolonization of the discipline. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2822912759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2822912759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-29b56724b7c1a61d9646fb63e0a32229842e9d28f3024e0218dfd441123d4a883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKeAV6Mzk-wm8SbFj0pBkHoO6W5Wt9RuTbaU_ntjV_DmaebwPu8MD2MXCNcIhb5JCiWiACIBIK0U2wM2Qq1ASGPNYd6lUaLQyhyzk5QWAGC11SP2PPsIvGlj6jkC8F3wMd3yyesVr2Lbt5Vf8hSqTd53PPWbug2J-1XN-4x9bULGmi7ydfBVOGNHjV-mcP47T9nbw_1s_CSmL4-T8d1UVBJVL8jOi1KTmusKfYm1LVXZzEsZwEsiskZRsDWZRgKpAISmbmqlEEnWyhsjT9nl0LuO3f4Ft-g2cZVPOjK5AEkXNqdoSFWxSymGxq1j--njziG4H2ducOayM7d35rYZkgOUcnj1HuJf9T_UN8INbMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822912759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace</title><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Rolf, Jan Niklas</creator><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Jan Niklas</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues that peace studies and the Welsh school of critical security studies both define themselves in opposition to the traditional view of security, with the only difference that the former goes through the concept of peace in voicing its critique of security. Pointing to some striking similarities in the epistemology, methodology and ontology of Johan Galtung and Ken Booth, it shows that the two studies have been driving on parallel roads and that they would profit greatly from joining forces. Being the kind of applied and anti-hegemonic science that scholars at Aberystwyth strive for, peace studies could provide the Welsh school with greater practical applicability and access to everyday life. The Welsh school, in turn, could endow peace studies with academic reputation and a solid critical foundation. This would not only put peace back on the agenda of IR, but also contribute towards the decolonization of the discipline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1384-5748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-3898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Decolonization ; Development Studies ; Epistemology ; Everyday life ; Foreign Policy ; Hegemony ; International Political Economy ; International Relations ; Ontology ; Original Article ; Peace ; Peace studies ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Science ; Security ; World War I ; World War II</subject><ispartof>International politics (Hague, Netherlands), 2023-06, Vol.60 (3), p.554-571</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-29b56724b7c1a61d9646fb63e0a32229842e9d28f3024e0218dfd441123d4a883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0563-1173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,12850,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Jan Niklas</creatorcontrib><title>The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace</title><title>International politics (Hague, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>Int Polit</addtitle><description>This paper argues that peace studies and the Welsh school of critical security studies both define themselves in opposition to the traditional view of security, with the only difference that the former goes through the concept of peace in voicing its critique of security. Pointing to some striking similarities in the epistemology, methodology and ontology of Johan Galtung and Ken Booth, it shows that the two studies have been driving on parallel roads and that they would profit greatly from joining forces. Being the kind of applied and anti-hegemonic science that scholars at Aberystwyth strive for, peace studies could provide the Welsh school with greater practical applicability and access to everyday life. The Welsh school, in turn, could endow peace studies with academic reputation and a solid critical foundation. This would not only put peace back on the agenda of IR, but also contribute towards the decolonization of the discipline.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Decolonization</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace studies</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>World War I</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>1384-5748</issn><issn>1740-3898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKeAV6Mzk-wm8SbFj0pBkHoO6W5Wt9RuTbaU_ntjV_DmaebwPu8MD2MXCNcIhb5JCiWiACIBIK0U2wM2Qq1ASGPNYd6lUaLQyhyzk5QWAGC11SP2PPsIvGlj6jkC8F3wMd3yyesVr2Lbt5Vf8hSqTd53PPWbug2J-1XN-4x9bULGmi7ydfBVOGNHjV-mcP47T9nbw_1s_CSmL4-T8d1UVBJVL8jOi1KTmusKfYm1LVXZzEsZwEsiskZRsDWZRgKpAISmbmqlEEnWyhsjT9nl0LuO3f4Ft-g2cZVPOjK5AEkXNqdoSFWxSymGxq1j--njziG4H2ducOayM7d35rYZkgOUcnj1HuJf9T_UN8INbMM</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Rolf, Jan Niklas</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0563-1173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace</title><author>Rolf, Jan Niklas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-29b56724b7c1a61d9646fb63e0a32229842e9d28f3024e0218dfd441123d4a883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Decolonization</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace studies</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>World War I</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Jan Niklas</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International politics (Hague, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rolf, Jan Niklas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace</atitle><jtitle>International politics (Hague, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>Int Polit</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>554</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>554-571</pages><issn>1384-5748</issn><eissn>1740-3898</eissn><abstract>This paper argues that peace studies and the Welsh school of critical security studies both define themselves in opposition to the traditional view of security, with the only difference that the former goes through the concept of peace in voicing its critique of security. Pointing to some striking similarities in the epistemology, methodology and ontology of Johan Galtung and Ken Booth, it shows that the two studies have been driving on parallel roads and that they would profit greatly from joining forces. Being the kind of applied and anti-hegemonic science that scholars at Aberystwyth strive for, peace studies could provide the Welsh school with greater practical applicability and access to everyday life. The Welsh school, in turn, could endow peace studies with academic reputation and a solid critical foundation. This would not only put peace back on the agenda of IR, but also contribute towards the decolonization of the discipline.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0563-1173</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1384-5748 |
| ispartof | International politics (Hague, Netherlands), 2023-06, Vol.60 (3), p.554-571 |
| issn | 1384-5748 1740-3898 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2822912759 |
| source | Springer Online Journals Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Academic disciplines Decolonization Development Studies Epistemology Everyday life Foreign Policy Hegemony International Political Economy International Relations Ontology Original Article Peace Peace studies Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Science Security World War I World War II |
| title | The first 100 years: IR, critical security studies and the quest for peace |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A04%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20first%20100%20years:%20IR,%20critical%20security%20studies%20and%20the%20quest%20for%20peace&rft.jtitle=International%20politics%20(Hague,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Rolf,%20Jan%20Niklas&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=554&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=554-571&rft.issn=1384-5748&rft.eissn=1740-3898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41311-022-00393-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2822912759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822912759&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |