Two-Body Problem in Curved Spacetime: the Case of GW150914

We compare two versions of the analysis of the gravitational wave signal GW150914 presented previously by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration (LVC). The first version was presented in 2016 by this collaboration along with their announcement of the first experimental detection of gravitational waves [ 1 ]....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Few-body systems 2023-05, Vol.64 (2), p.33, Article 33
Hauptverfasser: Yershov, Vladimir N., Raikov, Alexander A., Popova, Elena A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compare two versions of the analysis of the gravitational wave signal GW150914 presented previously by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration (LVC). The first version was presented in 2016 by this collaboration along with their announcement of the first experimental detection of gravitational waves [ 1 ]. It was based on rigorous general-relativistic treatment of the coalescing two-body problem. The second analysis of this signal by the same authors [ 2 ] was based on the quadrupole post-Newtonian (PN) approximation of General Relativity (GR). We revisit this post-Newtonian analysis and estimate the mass of the coalescing binary blackhole system using frequency values read directly from the time-frequency diagram of GW150914. Our estimation, similarly to the PN-result from [ 2 ], coincides with the rigorously calculated mass for this system from the LVC first publication. Additionally, we estimate the masses of other coalescing binary systems by using the same quadrupole PN-approximation formula applied to the data from the published gravitational wave transient catalogues. Practically all of our PN-approximation estimates coincide with the published masses based on the rigorous methods. In our view, this coincidence means that the rigorous theory for gravitational waveforms of coalescing blackhole binaries does not fully account for the difference between the source and detector reference frames because the PN-approximation, which is used for the comparison, does not make any distinction between these two reference frames: by design and by the principles and conditions for building the PN-approximation. We discuss possible implications of this conflict and find that the accuracy of the previously estimated characteristic (chirp) masses of coalescing binary blackhole systems is likely to be affected by a systematic error.
ISSN:1432-5411
0177-7963
1432-5411
DOI:10.1007/s00601-023-01799-9