Threat and Enhancement: Strength of Gamer Identity Moderates Affective Response to Messages About Gaming
Advancing hypotheses derived from social identity theory, we investigated the influence of gamer identity affiliation on affective responses to identity threats and enhancements. Participants viewed a message that either devalued (i.e., threatened) or elevated (i.e., enhanced) the status of gamers w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of media psychology 2024-03, Vol.36 (2), p.79-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Advancing hypotheses derived from social identity theory,
we investigated the influence of gamer identity affiliation on affective
responses to identity threats and enhancements. Participants viewed a message
that either devalued (i.e., threatened) or elevated (i.e., enhanced) the status
of gamers when associating them with a mass shooting event.
Relative to a control condition that neither threatened nor enhanced identity,
our data demonstrated that gamer identity affiliation moderated affect.
Specifically, greater gamer affiliation increased negative affect experienced
after a threatening message. By contrast, greater gamer affiliation increased
positive affect and reduced negative affect experienced after an enhancement
message. Analyses of participants' emotional reactions to the messages
revealed that individuals with stronger gamer identity affiliation reported
relatively more homogeneous emotions relative to individuals less affiliated
with gamer identity. We discuss these response patterns with respect to how
emotions may shape intergroup interaction in online communication. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1864-1105 2151-2388 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1864-1105/a000382 |