A hybrid non‐parametric ground motion model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe

In the current study, ground motion models (GMMs) are derived using the European Strong Motion (ESM) database for pseudo‐spectral acceleration (PSA), peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground displacement (PGD), cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), arias intensity (Ia),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2023-07, Vol.52 (8), p.2303-2322
Hauptverfasser: Sreenath, Vemula, Podili, Bhargavi, Raghukanth, S. T. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the current study, ground motion models (GMMs) are derived using the European Strong Motion (ESM) database for pseudo‐spectral acceleration (PSA), peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground displacement (PGD), cumulative absolute velocity (CAV), arias intensity (Ia), and significant duration. In addition to addressing random effects associated with ground motion regression, such as inter‐event, inter‐site, inter‐locality, and inter‐region variabilities, the current study also aims at reducing the standard deviations (STDs) of the GMMs through development of a hybrid non‐parametric GMM. The hybrid model is derived through an ensemble‐weighted method of five non‐parametric machine learning models: shallow neural network, deep neural network (DNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), support vector, and random forest (RF) regression techniques; with weights based on model performances. The resulting hybrid model, which also accounts for epistemic uncertainty, is compared against other regional models and is found superior for all output variables. The inter‐event, inter‐site, inter‐locality, and inter‐region deviations, and total ergodic sigma of PSA for the ensemble model lies between 0.3164–0.4478, 0.4156–0.5339, 0.1449–0.3687, 0.0819–0.2421, and 0.668–0.8545, respectively. The coefficient of determination (R2) between predicted and recorded values lies between 0.8435–0.9114 for all the output variables.
ISSN:0098-8847
1096-9845
DOI:10.1002/eqe.3845